Good intentions are depleted in the United Kingdom, France and Canada, asking Israel at the end of the Gaza attack

Israel went to the war after Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023 armed with an arsenal of weapons that mostly prompted, supplied, and then re -evaluated by the United States.

Its other allies gave Israel an actual thing in its own way: deep credit of goodwill and solidarity, based on the participation of 1,200 people, most of them Israeli civilians, and watching 251 people who are dragged into families in Gaza as hostages.

Now it seems that the balance of Israel has gone, at least in relation to France, the United Kingdom and Canada. They have issued their strongest condemnation so far from the way Israel is fighting the war in Gaza.

They say that Israel should stop it New attackWho Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will destroy Hamas, save the remaining hostages and put all Gaza under direct Israeli military control.

Their statement rejects Netanyahu’s arguments and calls for a ceasefire. The three governments together say that they “strongly oppose the expansion of Israeli military operations in Gaza,” adding: “The level of human suffering in Gaza is unbearable.”

They are calling for the release of the remaining hostages and remembering that after the “heinous attack” on October 7, they believe that the Israeli state “has the right to defend the Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is not completely proportional.”

Netanyahu’s decision to allow what he called the “minimum” foods to Gaza is “he said” not completely sufficient. ”

Netanyahu returned, saying that “the leaders in London, Utua and Paris are presenting a huge prize for the genocide attack on Israel on October 7 with more of these atrocities.”

He insisted that the war may end if the hostages restored the hostages, put its arms, agreed to its leaders to move to exile, and Gaza was appointed. “It cannot expect any nation to accept anything less, and Israel will certainly not accept,” he said.

Netanyahu – who was asking him for an international criminal court for war crimes and alleged crimes against humanity, which he rejected as “anti -Semitic” – was of severe international pressure to end the siege in Gaza after he warned a respectable international survey of imminent starvation.

At the London Summit between the European Union and the United Kingdom, the President of the European Council, Antonio Costa, described the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as “a tragedy violated by international law systematically, and the entire population is subjected to unproductive military force.”

“There must be safe, fast and non -approved access for humanitarian assistance,” he said.

Netanyahu’s reluctant decision was condemned to allow the limited supplies by very national coalition partners.

Etamar Bin Jafir, Minister of Security, who was convicted of incitement to racism and support for an extremist Jewish group classified by Israel as a terrorist organization, complained that Netanyahu’s decision “will nourish Hamas and give it oxygen while having to their hostages in the tunnels.”

Only five trucks arrived in Gaza on Monday, where Israeli forces, air strikes and artillery have advanced more Palestinian civilians, including many young children.

The opponents of Israel’s destruction of Gaza and the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians will say that the governments of France, the United Kingdom and Canada are talking too late.

Many of them held months of demonstrations protesting the death and destruction of Gaza – and more killing of Palestinian civilians and the confiscation of lands in the West Bank, and the other side of the Palestinian territories, during military operations and raids by armed Jewish settlers.

But sometimes in the war policy, a single incident carries a symbolic force that clarifies and crystallized so that they can force governments to work. This time, the killing was on March 23 by the Israeli forces in Gaza from 15 of the paramedics workers and assistants.

This came after Israel broke, on March 18, the two -month ceasefire with a series of huge air strikes.

After five days of the renewed war, the Israeli unit attacked the medical convoy, covered the men who were killed and worried about their bullets with sand. It was found that the Israeli account of what happened is incorrect when a mobile phone was recovered in the mass grave.

Its owner photographed the accident before he was killed. Away from the proof of Israel’s claim that emergency workers were a potential threat to Israeli combat soldiers, the video from the grave showed that ambulances and emergency cars clearly until almost every person was killed inside.

The alert has been growing rapidly since then, and not only among the usual opponents of Israel. Its European allies, with President Macron’s leadership from France on the way, tightened their language. The statement calling for the end of the Israeli attack is the most severe criticism of Israel so far.

A large European diplomatic source involved in their discussions told me that the harsh language reflects a “real feeling of the growing political anger of the humanitarian situation, from a line that is crossed, and this Israeli government appears to be acting without punishment.”

More worse for Israel, the statement says, “We will not stand by the Netanyahu government these terrible measures. If Israel does not stop the renewed military attack and raise its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take the steps of more concrete in response.”

They do not specify what it might be. Penalties can be one possibility. The biggest step is to recognize Palestine as an independent state.

France is considering joining 148 other states who did this at a conference, and it participates in the presidency with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in New York in early June. The United Kingdom also talked about the Palestinian recognition of the French.

Israel, which is accustomed to, told them that they would provide enthusiasm by winning. But the tone of the statement made by the French, the Canadians and the British indicates that Israel loses its ability to pressure it.