Giselle Bryant Not just preservation Eminem Just a lists of operational lists her entire family stops a small injustice.
the “Real housewives in Potomac“Star revealed that her children are now closing the radio whenever the rapper appears, as a result of his continuous legal battle with her and its host Robin Dixon about the name podcast.
The conflict began in 2023 when Gizelle Bryant and Robyn Dixon advanced to the “Shady” brand, which is the title of podcasts, a legally challenged step, claiming it was very close to his brand “Slim Shady”.
The article below the advertisement continues
Giselle Bryant says Emineim is unlimited at her home

Bryant, who is participating in Grace’s daughters, 20, twins Angel and Ten, 19, says her children are quick to close any song showing Eminem. “If this comes on the radio, in the car, my children will be like” this is Eminem.
Music Snub comes in a continuous legal dispute between Bryant, Dixon and Rap. Bryant said the people The process has lasted for a longer period than expected.
“The emineem suit is still ongoing. We are at the end of the tail, but you have to understand, it is like a problem of patent and trade, and they have their own timetable when it ends. So we are in their schedule,” she explained.
The article below the advertisement continues
Speaking of the drama, she added: “I find her foolishness. I want to end, for sure.” It is interesting, while Emineem’s music is outside the table, Bryant says her family is still listening to Dr. Duri despite his close relationships with rapper.
The article below the advertisement continues
“The reasonable”, the star of the real houses of Botomak, says “reasonable” is still prosperous

Bryant does not leave the battle of brands with Eyenim slowing its success in the podcast. The mother of the three says that her podge with Dixon is still strong even as the legal battle continues on her name.
“Reasonably dark, still works. We are like 10 million strong downloads in our fifth season,” Bryant participated.
The rapper, whose full name is Marshall Majorz III, objected to the “reasonable” brand, citing a potential confusion with his well -known Shadi character. The title has been linked to Eminem since his 1999 album “The Slim Shady LP”.
Maherz has retracted legally, asked for a preventive matter and argued that his testimony would be a burden given his “limited knowledge of the subjects in discussion.”
The article below the advertisement continues
Women prompted reality TV to nullify the singer after the initial denial
Brynet and Dixon were not ready to retreat after their first attempt was refused to interrogate Eminem in court. The podcasts have pushed forward in their legal battle by submitting a new request to drop the author of the songs.
As mentioned before The explosionThe US Patent and Trademarks Office spent in September 2024 that Bryant and Dixon were only able to nullify the director of Eminem, not the artist himself.
In October, Bryant and Dixon responded to a request to reconsider. They argued, “The deposition of Mr. Ma’ids is very important in determining ownership, validation of rights, and a mental state related to fame, along with actual confusion issues, and current use.”
The article below the advertisement continues
They also claimed that the restriction of a third party witness while facing a request to judge brief procedures will prevent them from installing a suitable defense.
The rapper argued that the name of the podcast will confuse the audience
Eyenim and his legal team prepared vigorously against Bryant and Dixon’s attempt for the brand of podcast, claiming that it may mislead the audience and damage the brand he spent in construction.
Through his lawyers, the 52 -year -old, through his lawyers, presented an official opposition to the application of the brand, on the pretext that he spent contracts to establish the ownership of the name “shaded”.
He carries brands for Slim Shady, Shady and Shady Limited, which all have been part of his identity since his rise to fame in the late 1990s. The E -Hinim team said that allowing the “reasonable shadows” brand can make people think it was involved in podcast or any relevant products.
The article below the advertisement continues
His lawyer argued that the name of the podcast was very similar in “appearance, sound and commercial impression”, and it is likely to cause “confusion, error and deception”.
Eyenim got rid of deposition, limited participation involved

The father of the Three was able to avoid wealth in the brand’s dispute, on the pretext that his direct participation in this matter was minimal and that the court appears unnecessary on it.
Eminem told the court that his personal testimony would not add value to the case, because he did not participate closely in the daily dealing of the shaded brand.
The artist identified three individuals who felt more appropriate to testify. His legal team named his manager, Paul Rosenberg, chief marketing official of the Universal Music Group, Eric Han, and the executive authority of the license, Stewart Bar, as a more relevant vision.
Gizelle Bryant’s position against EMINEM music programs, as it does not retract its battle to preserve things “reasonably shaded”.
Source link
https://theblast.prod.media.wordpress.mattersmedia.io/brand-img/123/1302×602/2025/05/01135641/Eminem-And-Gizelle-Bryant.jpg?