GDP against free people: The financial advisor starts as “the destruction of wealth”, says “the government is horrific in allocating the capital.”

India’s economic rope tightening between promoting GDP growth and free from free people is no longer a political debate limited to bureaucrats-it publicly plays through social media and influencing the morale of voters.

At the heart of this debate, a blatant option lies: Should governments pay long -term growth through investment in infrastructure and innovation, or should they give priority to popularity in the short term with gifts that win voices but may weaken economic basics?

Critics warn that excessive dependence on subsidies and consultations impedes financial health and the productivity of exciting business. Defenders oppose that these social welfare measures are the necessary life artery for the deprived. But when electoral strategies are strongly dependent on free gifts, the broader goal of building a flexible and self -sustainable economy is out of its path.

Sherfastava, the founder of Haksh, joined the growing choir that wondering about the economic safety of the culture of the promotional gift in India. Take to X (formerly on Twitter), called an inefficiency masked as a generosity.

“Option 1: You do not calculate the cost of incompetence. Every time the government decides to give a free mixer mill, it destroys wealth,” Sharrafastava wrote. “How? Because to pay the price of the mixer mill, they must impose taxes on a more specialized person. Or reduce the value of their savings by printing more money (what are they doing now).”

On the other hand, Shrivastava argued about what he called “increased volume of pie” – or stimulates real growth. He said: “When it produces value things, it leads to growth. The current debt will be divided due to the real increase in productivity. In corporate financing: this is called the allocation of effective capital. The government is horrific in this.”

Shrivastava’s comments came in response to the user who identified two contradictory approaches to GDP growth: one relies on redistribution through taxes and freezing, and the other is driven by business and innovation.

1) Tax pays and the government spends on free. This person later spends this money to help GDP.

2. The other person builds a startup, provides jobs and creates products/services that more people love to buy/use.

GDP is a function of the speed that money flows (do not think about printing money – I am eating continuous supplies of money). More speed of money, the most tax that the government gets. The user has now written any option you will choose.