President Donald Trump tried to ban Tijk during his first term, but during his second term he says he was “admired” to apply social video participation.
American leaders have done an amazing face On the truthHe left the public to ask whether years of bitter warnings about the threat of national security exaggerated from the beginning.
Just four years ago, President Donald Trump tried to prohibit the short video application directly, declaring that its Chinese ownership through Bytedance was “credible” risk of American data and security. Now, the White House is proud of the official Tiktok account, and the president rejects the same concerns as “very exaggerated”.
The transformation reflects the re -political calibration in Washington and the popularity of the increasing application. The Trump 2024 campaign bent over the reach of Techk, as it collected millions of followers. Last week, the White House officially launched an account, which confirmed a complete reflection of its first position.
Congress, at the same timeTake a much more difficult line. In 2024, legislators acknowledged an overwhelming majority of a law for stripping or banning, demanding the sale of American Tikchok or removal of the face from American application stores. But since he returned to his post, Trump has extended the deadline for abstraction three times – and promised to continue doing this – by effectively marginalizing the law.

Just four years ago, President Donald Trump tried to prohibit the short video application directly, declaring that its Chinese ownership through Bytedance was “credible” risk of American data and security. (Reuters / Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
Some legislators protested. Senator Mark Warner, D-FA, warned. Trump’s extensions were “against the law” and “a algorithm if the algorithm did not move from Beijing’s hands.” Representative John Molinaar, RR Mish, Chairman of the Chinese Committee of the Chinese Council of Representatives, argued that the United States should “allow (Tijook) to be dark.” However, along with a few extremist values, Congress installed a little resistance to delay by Trump.
“I am not really worried. I think he is very exaggerated … I am a fan of Tiktok,” Trump said on Friday when asked about the risks of data security.
This is a sharp exit from 2020, when executive orders were signed to force the sale of American Tiktok business and threaten to close the application completely. These efforts collapsed in court and the president Joe Biden She was later canceled in 2021, and replaced them with a broader national security review.
Critics argue that the threat has not changed, only Trump’s priorities. “None of the national security considerations have changed from the first president’s term to his current term,” said Michael Subolic, a older colleague at the Hudson Institute. “What has changed is the political environment: it turns out that Tiktok is politically beneficial to President Trump.” Solik also referred to Trump’s relations with the billionaire donor, Jeffrey Yas, who has a stake in Betianne: “It is clear that political support from (Yas) seems to have had some influence on him.”
General feelings have also been eased. A recent PEW poll found about a third of the Americans supporting the Tiktok ban, a decrease of 50 percent in March 2023. Another third opposes a direct ban, while the rest is still not specified.

On Friday, the US Federal Appeals Court supported a law that requires the Chinese to get rid of its short application in the short video in the United States by early next year or a ban. (Dado Ruvic / Reuters / Reuters)
Experts say mystery is reflected in Washington. Anopam Chandar, a law professor at Georgetown, who studies the global technology list, noted that the authors of Law 2024 have repeatedly insisted that they did not prohibit Takhk, but they are forced to sell. “Now, when it comes to enforcement, there is a question about what you want to enforce: Congress’s statements about what the law said, or the provision of the law itself,” he said.
Trump detonated “highly slope concessions to Beijing” after a chip deal, canceled a Taiwanese visit
Smred persons continue to warn that Tiktok can be forced to deliver user data to Beijing, or that it can be a strong algorithm to form American opinion. In April, after Trump slapped a very declining tariff on Chinese imports, Beijing has retreated from negotiations on Tiktok and began to amplify the Tariff fighting content on the platform. “It is clear that China uses Tiktok to transform Americans against Trump’s private policies – however it still does not impose the law,” Solik said.
Trade Secretary Howard Lootnick, however, hit a more stable tone. In an interview with CNBC on July 24, he warned that “if (China) does not agree to the deal, Tiktok will oppress.” So far, though, Trump has not indicated an appetite to let this happen.

Howard Lutnick listens to US President Donald Trump’s progress to notes before Lutnick has the constitutional oath as Minister of Trade at the White House Oval Office on February 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee / Getty Images / Getty Images)
On the next deadline looming on September 17. Each extension has made a less likely prohibition, and with Tiktok now integrating in Trump’s political play, it seems that the US government that was once applied has faded into the background.
Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here
Solik warned that any deal that China would be ready to accept it is likely to be the “fig paper”.
“If CCP is ready to sell Tiktok, they would have sold it a long time ago. They care about the strategic value of the application more than they care about the cash value.”
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxbusiness.com/foxbusiness.com/content/uploads/2025/08/0/0/trump-portrait.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
Source link