Follow Margot Robbie’s Barbie is the large box office fluctuation

Margot Ruby is one of the largest A list stars in Hollywood. It helped convert “Barbie” into one of the largest films of all time. Unfortunately, even when you associated with his colleague Oscar Numini Colin Farrell (“Penguin”), she could not help convert a “beautiful bold journey” into a blow. Far from that, unfortunately. The original romantic fantastic epic was bombed at the box office during the opening weekend, where Sony Pictures left the bag for this.

It was directed by Kogonada, a “beautiful, bold journey” that floundered at the local box office, leaving only $ 3.5 million in her first appearance. It was good enough for the sixth number on the graphs, barely above the movie “The Senior” ($ 2.6 million). It also decreased much lower than the humble box office expectations before the releaseWhich was in the range of $ 5 to 10 million dollars. The mud is worse, that the film is largely weak abroad as well, with only $ 4.5 million for a global launch of $ 8 million. This is a horrific thing for a movie with such big stars and a $ 45 million production budget. The competition was not a tremendous factor, as Jordan’s production produced by Bell “also felt to reduce expectations of $ 13.5 million, while” Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle “was ranked first with only $ 17.3 million. There was nothing on his way.

The film focuses on Sarah (Ruby) and David (Farrell), single strangers who meet at a joint friend’s wedding. Through the development of fate, they find themselves in the midst of a fictional and spacious adventure as they get important moments of their past.

Critics and the masses alike did not respond well. The film is currently sitting 37 % with critics Spoiled tomatoesTo go with the audience of 59 % of the poor. He has Review “Big Bold Big Trip” for /Film“It is not great, it’s barely bold, and it is only beautiful on its surface.”

Credit when entitled, Sony truly tried to produce an original movie driven by stars that could appeal to adults. Given that Ruby and Farrell are very large names, the $ 45 million budget is terribly unreasonable. But the masses are more selective than ever when it comes to leaving the house to see something in the theater. This marketing was not transmitted as a necessary cinematic event. Therefore, when the reviews appeared, its fate was largely for the institution. Now, Sony will have to hope to lead a curiosity to lead the VOD numbers for this movie in the coming weeks.

For both Ruby and Farrell, it is a strong blow to their stellar strength. Ruby helped make “Barbie” as a $ 1.4 billion crush strike. It was also a large part of the attraction of Quentin Tarantino “once in Hollywood”, while her role in collapse was “Wall Street” ($ 392 million), the largest movie of Martin Scorsese ever. But at this point, Ruby’s mistakes began to excel visits. “Mary Queen of Scots” ($ 48 million worldwide), “Bombshell” ($ 61 million worldwide), “birds of prey” ($ 205 million worldwide), “Amsterdam” ($ 29 million worldwide) and “Babylon” ($ 64 million worldwide) (if the performance is not eliminated).

As for Farrell, it was a large part of the big songs such as “The Batman” ($ 772 million worldwide), but his stellar strength did not extend to obtaining the heels in the seats just because it is in a movie for a long time. It is a respectable actor that can be an additional value element for the right film, such as “Wonderful monsters and where you can find them” ($ 816 million worldwide) But it does not only make people go out to see something original. The same applies to Ruby. It is positive evidence that purposeful movie stars are difficult to reach in the era of the epidemic.

“A beautiful, bold, big journey” in theaters now.