Five fast food from the Senate Certificate of the Senate in the Senate

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Anthony ZurcherNorth American correspondent

Watch: Main Moments of the Senate’s Senate’s hearing

Bam Bondi’s testimony was expected to be before the Senate Judicial Committee, a controversial party case. Right to this bills.

The first appearance of the General Prosecutor was in a supervisory session in Congress – that was at the appropriate time.

Two weeks ago, the Ministry of Justice to it Former FBI director James Komei accusedWhich leads to a protest from democratic politicians.

Her testimony also came on Tuesday, just one day after a group of former Ministry of Justice employees issued a letter accusing Bondi of helping to take “Hamshammer” to “the work that the administration has long done to protect societies and the rule of law.”

The nerves were raw, and Bondi was clearly ready to fight. Here are five fast food from the session.

1) Bondi goes to the attack

The recent Trump administration officials, including health minister Robert Kennedy Junior and FBI director Cash Patel, have relied on a clear playing book for a certificate before the hostile Congress committees.

Go in the attack early and often.

This strategy was offered throughout Bondi’s certificate. When she was pressured on the deployment of the National Guard, she said she wished that Senator Dick Dorbin in Illinois and Senator California Alex Padilla loved their states as “as much as they hate Donald Trump.”

When I was asked about Jeffrey Epstein, I noticed that many Democratic Senators had taken money from the deep -related donors who have relations with the late convicted sexual trader.

Bondi launched a series of indicative attacks on Senators while interrogating it.

When it’s time for Hennor Fairmont Peter Walsh to ask questions, Bondi’s miles began to launch personal attacks.

“I will wait for my role,” said the soft soft New England. “But you don’t have to do this now.”

Witness: Trump says, “There will be others” after Kumi’s accusation

2) Many questions, few answers

When Bondi was not in the attack, she often refused to comment on questions from both Democrats and Republicans.

She said that she will not discuss “employees’ issues” when interrogating a series of shootings at the Ministry of Justice at the highest level, including senior FBI officials and American lawyer who recommended not to accuse Kumi.

You will not comment on “ongoing investigations” and legal procedures – including the Kumi case. It will also not shed light on the conversations it had with the president or other White House assistants.

When she presented a big picture of her sitting on a table with the president the next day for Trump, Trump formulated a social post calling her to accuse Komei, her only note was that she loved the picture.

“This is supposed to be an supervision session where members of Congress can obtain serious answers to dangerous questions,” said Senator Adam Chef in California.

“I think you owe the president an apology for your entire professional life,” Bondi replied.

3) Bondi is keen to focus on the crime

Bondi seemed to focus on what it said was the goal of the Trump administration of reducing crime in the United States.

It was fast in the statistics that she said showed the successes that she has achieved so far – the number of arrests in Washington, DC, the suppression of drugs, illegal firearm confiscations in Chicago, and drug seizures on the border.

“We return to our basic mission of fighting real crime,” Bondi said.

Democrats may have other ideas, but Bondi – and the White House – may feel that they are on a safer political ground when they talk about crime fighting.

It is an issue, according to opinion polls, many Americans-who have the ability to appeal not only for the second conflicting conservative, but also for independent and democratic voters as well.

4) But the Democrats focus on Epstein

A certain heat source for Bondi over the past few months has been dealing with the Ministry of Justice with its investigation in Epstein, which before his death had been well documented with many wealthy and strong Americans.

For most of the session, it was the Democrats who overcame Bondi with questions related to the two strata.

Senator Sheldon Whitheus wanted to know whether the FBI had discovered pictures of Trump and “non -naked young women”, and whether the Ministry of Justice looked at “suspicious activity reports” on Epsin’s affairs.

Bondi will not answer.

Dick Dorbin asked about the allegations that the Ministry of Justice had a sign of anything in Epsin’s documents related to Trump for the president.

Bondi replied, “I will not discuss anything about it with you, Sinator.”

The Attorney General was asked why her circle now says that there is no list of Epstein’s customers after she claimed earlier that she had this information on her office.

Bondi stated by referring to the previous discovery of the administration that there is no evidence of conspiracy or cover -up surrounding the investigation.

The American Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC), a member of the Senate Judicial Committee, speaks in a supervision session of US Prosecutor Bam Bondi in Capitol Hill, WashingtonReuters

The session was Sharia – as both parties attacked their interrogation

The questions that are still about the investigation of Epsin were a rare source in the interest of the two parties, as some Republicans joined the Democrats to call for more transparency. It took some time, but this Senate hearing finally gave some indications of this.

Republican Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana recounted the recent comments by Trade Secretary Howard Lootnick that Epstein was “the greatest extortion ever.”

Senator Louisiana Lootnick, who owned a house near Epstein in Palm Beach Florida, suggested that he be witnessed in front of Congress and speak to the FBI.

Bondi continued her dance in Epstein, saying that it is up to Lootnik director and FBI director Cash Patel to report whether the meeting was necessary.

5) Republicans look back in anger

If Democrats focus on what they consider an unprecedented weapon for the Ministry of Justice during the Trump era, most Republican Senate members were more interested in fighting battles than Biden – or earlier.

Senator Iowa Chuck Grasli spent most of the listening sessions that interfered with how Democrats, in his opinion, achieved investigations into the Biden family dealings.

Sinator South Carolina Lindsey Graham condemned the investigation of the FBI in Russia after the 2016 presidential elections. Ted Cruz of Texas focused on protests outside the homes of the conservative Supreme Court judges in the wake of their decision to 2021, which overturned abortion rights.

Eric Schmidt from Missouri filled the real Pingo card from right -wing complaints to the Ministry of Justice.

Bondi, for her part, agreed with sincerity with the Republican choir.

When the last five -hour hearing ended, the event was feeling a party home, where each other was accused of political weapons and party trials.

“The Ministry of Justice is the guardian of the nation for fairness and the rule of law,” Senator Alex Badilla said during his interrogation. “When the public’s confidence collapses, justice itself is in danger.”

This is the type of suspension that the Republicans and Democrats can agree on – before throwing the other side as a source of illnesses in the country.



https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/5fe1/live/f2a8f5e0-a3b6-11f0-b741-177e3e2c2fc7.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment