Film schools embrace artificial intelligence. They should?

Jake Banek, a 20 -year -old pioneer, says he spent a great time at Depaul University in Chicago, and a very positive experience with the school’s cinema program. However, a modern email message alerting students to a new course in “AI Scrinkinging” sparked a set of anger that is not exploited in it.

The e -mail, which was circulated last week, provided the opportunity for university students to study “the sophisticated rapid role of artificial intelligence in the screenwriting process” and help students “explore how the AI Agency can support creativity and enhance it in writing for cinema and television”. Banik did not have it.

Soon after receiving the email, the young director was so angry that he took to Instagram To express his ideas: “Seeing this email made me feel embarrassed to be a student in the movie” Depaul “, he wrote, put a mark on the school and its cinematic program. “I think that the professor who will teach this course, and every student is registered in this course, and everyone who allows this course to happen must be considered seriously – this path should not be anything.”

When Panek spoke to me about the program, it does not seem to condemn the separation a lot. He told me: “I think it is nonsense.” “I am very angry at his presence.”

Deboul Film Arts School It is considered One of the best cinematic programs in the country, and often distinguishes itself by allowing the Student Authority to reach advanced equipment and programs. Recently, however, school officials are interested in Amnesty International. In May, the films program held a symposium “AI in the Arts”, Designer “The transformational role of artificial intelligence in the arts.” Matthew Quinn, Professor of Depaul, who was charged with teaching the new script writing course, said even before this event, some people inside the administration were pushing the film program to increase the integration of artificial intelligence in its approach.

“Our school, the Film Arts School, is located in the College of Computing and Digital Media,” said Queen. “Our dean is from the computing school, so they are, of course, are very investors in artificial intelligence.” He added that Depaul has Amnesty International, noting that there is an effort at the university level to study and integrate artificial intelligence into the curriculum.

What does the “AI script writing” course involve? Quinn said that the course was very similar to other scenario writing courses that he taught, with a major difference that the obstetric intelligence was used to help create and form materials. “Thus, when it comes to generating registry lines, then working on the personal BIOS and developing the character, then it is ultimately crowned with a step scheme (The broad step Queen said that the students in the class will cooperate with ChatGPT.

Quinn also indicated that the Depaul movie program has a policy that requires students to recognize artificial intelligence in writing script. If students use it, they must explain the reason and how, he said. He added that it is currently according to the college’s discretion to determine whether or not students can use artificial intelligence in this way.

Depaul is not the only cinematic school that has started to provide courses related to Amnesty International. South California University recently launched Amnesty International for Media and StoriesIt is designed to explore how to integrate technology into film, media and press industries. UCLA Extension recently launched a new course called “The creative process in the era of artificial intelligence“Even the American Film Institute has immersed its toes in space, yet For the first time a three -day seminar chain appeared On “tell stories and AI” earlier this year.

Holly Willis, co -director of AI Studio at the University of Southern California, said that the school is interested in developing a new program for Amnesty International in 2023, long after the launch of ChatGPT and GroundsWell of cultural interest in artificial intelligence. “It was somewhat at the same time,” Willis said. “I think at that moment, it was a big thing, we realized” Oh, this is a really important transformation, “she said.

Willis, who now studied multiple courses studying potential creative applications for Amnesty International, describes itself as “very critical” of technology, but she also said that she is “very excited about new forms of stories” that technology can provide. She said: “I think there are specific problems with the intrusive artificial intelligence and how they were presented to filmmakers and artists, and how, at the present time, many ownership of the tools in the context of the company.” “But at the same time, the work that I see is really exciting.”

in article About the use of artificial intelligence in the arts, Willis highlights the work of Souki Mansoor, a former documentary “stumbling in the rabbit hole in the filmmaking of artificial intelligence” and is now working in the technology industry. Mansoor, who held the position of guest speaker in one of Willis’ AI-THEMED chapters, is currently working in Openai as “Sora Artist Program”, according to Her profile LinkedIn. It is not really clear, but Mansoor, which describes itself as a “recovery movie maker”, has produced some visual pieces using platforms like Openai that is currently marketing. Indeed, in 2023, she “created” a short movie called Amnesty International Dreams of DogUsing claims that were inserted into Gen2 Runwayml.

While Willis expresses the excitement of works of the kind produced by Mansoor, she notes that some of her students seem a little concern about pumping artificial intelligence into the arts. “I would like to say that students are very tense,” she said. She said: “In the first grade that I taught when we started this initiative, the students were very careful … like,” Why do we pay for this education when anyone can create these pictures easily easily? “They did not realize that you still need” skills and storytelling. “

As for the screenwriting course from Depaul, Queen said he had not seen much retreat from students, but there is no great interest as well. “At the present time, there are not even many students who joined him,” Queen told me. “It may not run.” He also explained that the course was not about embracing artificial intelligence. Instead, he described it as a workshop aimed at exposing students to different views on the “current status of operation” of technology and what you can offer is likely to offer creators. Quinn admitted that he is the same “conflicting” about the use of artificial intelligence in creative arts. He said: “It is not as if I am a huge supporter of artificial intelligence and love artificial intelligence.” “It seems more like, as a teacher, I feel that I am canceling the harm of students if I don’t show them to this or demonstrate as it does not happen.” Queen wants students to make an enlightened decision on whether or not they want to deal with artificial intelligence, and to do so, they need to understand it.

For students like a panic, the whole thing appears to be a huge betrayal of the essentials of the creative process. “I understand the desire, as an artist, to take an abbreviation,” Banik’s show. After all, making films is very difficult, and he may often feel the world against you. But Panek said that he and his fellow students find their own ways to solve problems – this is part of films. “Ultimately, he does nothing to anyone,” he said. He added: “You do not gain anything by writing something on a computer and getting it on you.”

“The film industry is difficult,” Banik said, while noting that “if you are not ready … find your own solutions to things, and your first idea,” Oh, Ai Generative exists, let’s just use it “” it is difficult to really call yourself an artist.