Executive presidents quietly tell us: Amnesty International is a shop

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Fear is real. In meetings, recession chats, and beverages after work, one question is quietly dealing with millions of employees: Will Amnesty International take my job?

In public places, executive presidents love to seem reassuring. They say that the obstetric intelligence will “enhance productivity” or “simplification operations”. But when you already read what they tell their employees, or what is sliding in investor notes, the message is chilling: the hypothetical workers are here, and they are not only assistants. They are alternatives.

Let’s take a closer look at what some of the world’s leading CEOs say. Not in noise videos, but in official interior, blog posts, and investor updates.

1. Amazon Andy Jaci: “We will need fewer people”

The CEO of Amazon Andy Jaci recently Published A message at the company’s level looks reasonable, until you already read it.

“When we offer more than artificial intelligence and agents, it must change the way we work. We will need fewer people who do some jobs that are performed today … We expect this will reduce the total workforce of companies as we get efficiency gains from using artificial intelligence throughout the company.”

The main phrase? “The next few years.” These companies talk about 2026 to 2028. Not ten years. This is soon.

Jassy not only talks about automating simple or repeated tasks. It is the employees to obtain a reality as artificial intelligence replaces the entire job categories in all fields, and where the employment slows down or completely stops the roles that the machines can do now.

2. Louis von Ahn from Dolingo: “The number of employees will not be given unless.” Amnesty International cannot do the mission

In a note to publish To LinkedIn, the CEO of Duolingo Luis von Ahn was more explicit. “Most jobs will have specific initiatives to change how they work mainly … The number of employees will not be given unless the team is unable to run more of their work.”

Translation: No more employment unless it is impossible for your job to do. The company bets that most of the teams will soon need a fewer people.

3. Shopify’s Tobi Lütke: Why cannot artificial intelligence do this?

The CEO of Shopify Topi Lütke shared a similar guidance on X: “Before he asked for more resources and resources, the difference must explain why they cannot get what they want to do using artificial intelligence … How will this region look like if artificial intelligence agents already part of the team?” Lütke explicitly asks managers to re -imagine a difference as if artificial intelligence agents have already been combined, and to justify the reason for no human being.

The message from these executives is clear: Human employees are now the last resort. The new virtual is automation.

Marc Beniof, CEO of Salesforce recently, stated that artificial intelligence is already 50 % of work within his company, shortly before the announcement of 1,000 other discounts in jobs. KLARNA CEO, a major company in Fintech, was more explicit, and revealed that artificial intelligence has already allowed the company to reduce its operating power by 40 %.

Reality: Virtual workers are already present

These are not future scenarios. This really happens.

The reason for this sudden shift is the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology. As the CEO of Openai Sam Altman recently explained, the latest “thinking models” jumped a critical leap. In simple phrases, these artificial intelligence systems can do more than just finding information; They can “think” through complex multi -steps. Altman suggested that these models can cause equality with a person with a doctorate degree, which means that they are now able to perform high -level analytical tasks once they are booked to human beings high education.

This ability is actively harnessed. Three sources working in Major AI Labs Gizmodo have been told that they are training strong models to perform the real world’s tasks in almost every “knowledge work” profession, including banking, financial analysis, insurance, law, and even press. These sources, who asked not to be identified because their contracts prevent them from speaking publicly, described how their work is used in comparisons along with artificial intelligence models to improve technology so that they can produce professional output with minimal errors. Virtual employees are already our functions; The current stage is simply about making it more perfect.

The “next few years” that Jaci talked about it may be closer to two years at most.

Equipment hairstyles accelerate

Consider the recent demobilization trends in the technology industry. In 2024, 551 technical companies recorded approximately 152,922 employees, according to data from Driving. The pace accelerated this year. In the first six months of 2025, 151 technical companies have registered more than 63,823 people. On average, the technology company reduced 277 workers in 2024. If this rate is preserved for the rest of the year, the average number of demobilization operations for each technical company in 2025 will rise to 851, or nearly three times average average of 2024.

Although there is no direct evidence linking all workers ’layoffs on artificial intelligence, the trend occurs during a period of registered economic power. The Nasdaq Stock Exchange closed its highest levels ever, and eight of the ten largest companies in the world in the technology sector. The profitable companies grow, workers falling at a rate that warns of danger, and the calm implementation of Amnesty International is the most logical interpretation.

We took

Executive managers will not tell you that technology is explicitly replaced. But notes talk about themselves.

Artificial intelligence is already here, and your company is likely to build a road map to automate your role. One experimental project at one time. One Chatbot at one time. Freeze one recruitment at one time. If you want to understand what is the next of the American workforce, don’t listen to marketing. Read the footnotes in the CEO blog. Because they really tell you the truth.





https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2023/05/d288a7719904870b2cf82b574bbea3a0.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment