European Court rules in favor of the latest transfer framework for US and European Union data

She rejected the second highest challenge in Europe Between the European Union and the United States. “On the date of the disputes of the disputed decision, the United States of America guaranteed an appropriate level of protection for personal data transferred from the European Union to the organizations in that country,” the European Union General Court ruled ().

The two sides brokered the peculiarities in the Atlantic Data in 2023 to continue to allow American companies to store personal data for European users on US servers. The agreement included an offer that allows Europeans to file complaints about what American companies do with their data.

French politician Philip Latumbi filed a lawsuit against the European Commission (EC), the executive arm of the European Union and the authority that concluded the deal with the United States, claiming that “there are insufficient guarantees for respect for private life and the family in the agreement because of the wide group and quantities of personal data,” according to personal data, “according to what he said . He also said that the Data Protection Review Court (DPRC), It was not an independent court and did not necessarily provide the required protection level under European law.

The General Court decided that the performance of the judges and their appointment in the Democratic Korea “accompanied by many guarantees and conditions to ensure the independence of its members.” He stated that the judges can only be removed by the public prosecutor and for the reason, while AG agencies and intelligence “may not hinder or incorrectly affect their work.”

The political scene has turned significantly since the agreement was reached in 2023. The Trump administration has On independent government agencies, they were on the heads of Logbars with the European Union on issues such as organizing major technology companies in the United States and international trade. However, the General Court indicates that the European Commission is required to monitor the application of the legal framework.

“If the legal framework in force in the United States is at the time of adopting the disputed decision changes, the committee may, if necessary, decide to suspend, amend, cancel the disputed decision, or limit its scope,” the court said. Judges also rejected Latombe’s claims regarding collecting personal data for personal data.

Latombe can still transfer the case to the European Union’s Court of Justice. The Supreme Court in Europe has previously canceled two previous deals to transfer data between the European Union and the United States – and -In the wake of the challenges reached by the pro -price activist Max Sherims, who raised concerns about the arrival of US intelligence agencies to the special data of European citizens.