Eng VS Ind: Stuart Broad Names two bold

former England Paceer Stewart Broad criticize IndiaThe team’s selection of the first test against England in Hideengley, describing it as a major tactical error. India, despite the publication of five centuries through two roles, lost the match with five share after England chased a record 371.

Stuart Broad indicates an error in choosing India in Headingley

According to Broad, one of the main reasons for the failure of India was the field decision Sharadol Thakur Instead of the left wrist vertigo Coldep Yadaf. Speaking of podcasts for the love of the cricket game, Broad highly highlighted that the conditions in the traditional Edgbaston and England against the rotation made Kuldeep a perfect choice.

The Indian Bowling attack in the first test was lacking in the decisive moments, especially during the Run chase in England. while Sharadol Thakur It provides the depth of multiplication, the bowling lacked penetration, and the Kuldeep capacity to bring the diversity and deception of the fighters with its wrist.

Broad believes that Coldep’s inserts would have given India a strategic advantage, especially with the approach to the attack in England under Ben Stock and Brendon McCallumThe famous “Bazbal” showed signs of the struggle against the rotation of the wrist. The Broad’s proposal is in line with the previous analyzes of KuldeeP, especially when it is associated with a high -pressure attack led by Jasbert Pomra.

“I think they made a mistake in choosing their team, if you were honest. Kuldeeep Yadav would have played instead of Shaardul Thakur. Especially with the stadium type and the England struggle known against a wrist, Kuldeep could have made a big difference,” “For the love of cricket.”

Also read: Rohit Sharma reveals the unknown champion behind the T20 World Cup victory in India

Supports another star player for Edgbaston if Bumra breaks

We look at the second test on Edgbaston, Brood player another idea: If Pomara breaks as part of the work burden management plan in India, the team must consider delivering the first emergence of the left arm weapon Arshadib Singh. Broad argue that the ARSHDEEP natural angle and its ability to swing the ball early can be one of the valuable assets in English conditions.

while Krishna Raside Signs of improvement in the second roles showed, and Broad felt that the Indian attack as a unit lacking the sting and consistency needed to break the partnerships and maintain pressure. ARSHDEEP, who got 66 share in 21 first -class games at a rate of 30.37, can bring freshness that affects its need and the left arm contrast. However, the competition from Akash Deep may hold selection decisions, especially with India, which is now in the chain and under pressure to wear.

“If Pommeria will rest in Edgbaston, I will be seduced by bringing Arshdeep Singh. Wholesale changes, “” Broad concluded.

Also read: Eng VS Ind: 3 players who can replace Jasprit Bumrah in the second test in Edgbaston