Eng VS Ind 2025: This is the reason why Rishaabh Pant reprimand

the England opposite India The test series started with high intensity and drama, and it didn’t take long until the tensions leak into the field. On the third day of the Headingley test, Rishab PantThe star goalkeeper in India succeeded in the wrong aspect of the law after an emotional response to the ruling.

Rishaabh Pant’s moving behavior during the first England roles

The moment of controversy occurred during the 61st of England’s first roles. Referees in the field Paul Verle and Chris Javani She conducted a routine examination of the ball using a scale to check any shape. While these checks are standard in the long coordination cricket game, the referees have decided that the ball does not require replacement.

Pant, apparently dissatisfied with the call, His reaction was to throw the ball On the ground in visible frustration – an act that was not respected for officials.

Also read: List of the elite consisting of 5 Indian fighters with two centuries of twin

Why was Pant reprimanded?

Pant behavior was classified as a violation of the rules of the behavior of the International Criminal Court, specifically under Article 2.8, which relates to the opposition shown in the ruling decision. In a quick response, the International Criminal Court issued an official reprimand to Pant. According to the statement issued by the referee, the Indian player accepted the responsibility for his actions and agreed to the punishment suggested by the referee on the match, Richie Richardson, and thus avoid the need for an official hearing.

“The Indian Rishab Pant was handed over to an official reprimand for the rating of the 1st level of ICC behavior law during the third day of the first test against England in Hideengley,” Read the statement.

Disciplinary procedures include one of Demerit Point added to his first PANT record since his international appearance. According to the rules of the International Criminal Court, Level 1 crimes usually carry a minimal penalty, from reprimand to a fine of up to 50 % of the match fees, along with a point or two points Demerit.

The charge was filed by a full set of match officials-Reiffel and Gafffaney (referees in the field), Sherfudola bin Shahid (Government TV), and Mike Burns (The fourth ruling). She left their collective observation of Pant behavior with little ambiguity in the evaluation.

Also read: Is the best wikit goalkeeper in Rishpe Pant in India on the history of cricket test? Numbers tell the story