Enceclopedia britannica wants to be confused to stop using her slogans when artificial intelligence makes things

Merriam-Webster dictionary identification The verb is impersonating it as “theft and passage (ideas or other words) as one: the use of (another production) without attributing to the source.” This is exactly what AI ProParts, Encyclopedia Britannica foot Thursday at the American Provincial Court of the southern region of New York.

Artificial intelligence companies, such as confusion, are not strangers in cases of violation of copyright. Openaiand Midjourney Others are currently fighting these types of legal allegations in court. (Disclosure: Zif Davis, the parent company CNET, filed a lawsuit against Openai, claimed that it had violated the copyright of ZifF Davis in training and operating artificial intelligence systems.)

The Brewka encyclopedia complaint is a little different. In the first place, the publisher is concerned with the results that have been trained in AI, rather than how to train basic technology (a large language model).

---

Do not miss any non -biased technology content and laboratory -based reviews. Add cnet As a favorite Google source.

---

Confusion is also somewhat unique between artificial intelligence companies. that it Revenue sharing program It aims to grant media companies such as Encyclopedia britannica a small wedge of the profit pie. At the same time, the publisher argues that the presence of this program proves that the artificial intelligence company knows that there is a market for the content created by man. Instead of paying to reach this copyright content, it is claimed that confusion takes it without permission or payment.

What is also different in this complaint is that the Pretanica encyclopedia is specifically the potential damage of the reputation it suffers from a biography’s violation of the brand. When you ask a question about confusion, the reply can include a link to the original sources, along with websites. However, artificial intelligence does not always get everything properly; Things can be made in errors called Hallucinogenic.

Encyclopedia britannica does not want the names of their brands or commercial signs anywhere near the wrong information, and writing in the complaint that the content created by AI “confuses and deceives users in confusion (falsely) that hallucinations are linked to it, or sponsored by the” company “.

The publisher also claims that the robot that runs on the Internet in confusion allows the volatile volatile content. There are similar concerns about the New York Times lawsuit against the Chats of Microsa Obayy.

The Britisha Encyclopedia did not respond immediately to the comment.

The Copyright Law provides major protection for publishers and copyright creators, and it has become one of the most Controversial legal issues In artificial intelligence. Usually, if the company wants to use copyright -protected materials, it must obtain permission from the rights holder and license them. Technology companies pay exceptions to “fair use”, a legal concept that will give them permission to use protected content without negotiating with creators.

Claude maker man and Dead He recently won copyright issues under the exception of fair use. Antarubor judge said that the use of the artificial intelligence company for copyrights protected it “is very transformed.” But both judges have warned that technology companies will not always win future issues.