Emma Watson drama depends on a banned book in schools

Next literature can be an integral part of adolescent experience. These stories about growth pain are often a mirror, which enhances a better understanding of intense and unprocessed emotions. Books that are also intended for adult youth can also appeal to the broader demographic attractiveness, as the language of pain is universal, and comfort can be found in different angles of art.

“The Perks of Being A Wall-Flower” is for Stephen Chaposky one of these books, as he tells a coming story that was partially extracted from the author’s memories. It is a difficult book only due to how to capture Chibosky extensively from the torment and bliss associated with growth (where the feelings of belonging are permeated with seizures of sharp unity). It goes without saying that the novel deals with some heavy topics, including drug use, sexual assault, and mental health crises, which Chibosky uses to explore the meaning of being young and troubled.

Unfortunately, these topics were transformed “privileges for being the wall of the wall” into a goal to ban an outbreak, with the 1999 Chbosky novel either briefly or removed it fully from many American school libraries. This type of censorship places a dangerous precedent for what can be reached for a smaller population (and otherwise), creating a slippery slope that may lead to ideological nearsightedness. Until the reverence, The best -selling authors like Stephen King are not exempt from this censorshipAs a moderate political book, not completely preserved The “dead area” was also banned by many schools Just because it is a horror story.

When asked about the prohibition of the repeated book, Taberski once said The National Coalition against Censorship He was very sad about it, because he stole children from an experience that could have made them feel a little less:

“It has passed many times (the book’s ban) has passed to the point that I lost frankly the count. I know that it made the list of the best 10 times in the American Library Association five times, so this happened a lot (…) I was sad because you publish a book, partly, to finish silence on some issues. Therefore, every time this happens, I think about this child in a society that can really use the book.”

Let’s go deeper into the reasons that make the Tabuski novel be considered inappropriate for school libraries, and how the contents of the book (as well as his cinematic adaptation, which is starring “Harry Potter”, is actually against these concerns.

In 2012, Teasboski (also directed by “Dear Evan Hansen”) I removed a film version of “Privileges from being a flower flower”, which works specialized in transferring sweet complications and bitter the original novel. In the film, Charlie (Logan Lerman) unintentionally deals with stress after shock while moving at high school, and finding comfort in his relationships with his fellow students Patrick (Ezra) and the Order of Emma Watson. But while Sam and Patrick do their best to be an emotional anchor for Charlie, they are drowning in their rooted problems in identity, loss and success of self -esteem.

The Chibosky movie does not spoil his approach to exploring these uncomfortable feelings, creating a very beating and impressive journey that it has achieved a classic majesty shortly after its release. On the critical and commercial front, the film was good (with a total of 33.3 million dollars for a budget of $ 13 million) and was praised for its committed central performance, as well as its ability to address heavy topics with a slight difference.

Unfortunately, such differences have been lost on people who have been impatient to prohibit Chbosky’s book since its publication. According to Marshall University Library“Privileges of being a flower of walls” in American schools were banned for reasons ranging from “profanity, drug use descriptions, explicit sexual behavior, and torture” to mention them from homosexuality and “offensive content” with regard to Patrick. Even in cases where the book has not been fully banned, its presence in school libraries is often defined (and in some cases, it was kept) from 2003 to 2023.

While these concerns are terrible enough, some schools have blocked “privileges for being a wall flower” only on the basis of being “disgusting”, which is clearly a reaction to the knee to the complex features that Chibusky explores in the novel. Moreover, it must be clarified that none of these topics is dealt with in an exciting or unjustified way; It is simply part of the story and the tricks of her troubled characters, which are dealt with with a deliberate feeling of sympathy. Control of such an influential literary experience strongly limits the child’s understanding of the lack of comfort for adolescents, as well as high friendships that begin to feel a lot like home.