Elon Musk wants to use artificial intelligence to turn on Gov’t, but experts say “a very bad idea” | Elon Musk News

Is Elon Musk plan to use artificial intelligence to manage the United States government? This appears to be his plan, but experts say it is a “very bad idea.”

Musk launched tens of thousands of federal government employees through his government’s Ministry of Enable (DOGE), and is said to be asking the remaining workers to send the administration a weekly e -mail that includes five bullet points describing what they accomplished this week.

Since this will undoubtedly lengthen hundreds of thousands of these types of emails, Musk depends on artificial intelligence to address responses and help identify who should remain a factor. It is said that part of this plan is to replace many government workers with artificial intelligence systems.

It is not yet clear how any of these artificial intelligence systems appear or how it works – a bit of Democrats at the United States Conference demanding filling – but experts warn that the use of artificial intelligence in the federal government without a strong test and checking these tools can have disaster consequences.

“To use artificial intelligence tools responsibly, they must be designed with a specific purpose in mind. It should be tested and validated by their health. Carrie Koglianz, professor of law and political science at the University of Pennsylvania, says it is not clear whether any of that is being done here.

If artificial intelligence is used to make decisions about who must be completed, he will be “very skeptical” in this approach, “Coglanese says. He says there are very real capabilities to create errors, so that artificial intelligence is biased and for other potential problems.

It is a very bad idea. We do not know anything about how artificial intelligence takes such decisions (including how to train them and basic algorithms), and the data that these decisions will be, or why we should believe that they are trustworthy, “says Shubita Parthasarati, professor of public policy at the University of Michigan.

These concerns do not seem to hinder the current government, especially with Musk – a billionaire businessman and a close adviser to US President Donald Trump – leading the charge of these efforts.

The US State Department plans, for example, to use artificial intelligence to scan social media accounts for foreign citizens to identify anyone who may be supportive of Hamas in an attempt to cancel their visas. The United States government has not yet been transparent on how these types of regimes work.

Uncommon damage

“The Trump administration is really concerned with following up on artificial intelligence at any cost, and I would like to see fair, fair and fair use of Amnesty International,” says Hilke Schellmann, Professor of Journalism at New York University and artificial intelligence expert. “There can be a lot of damage that has not been discovered.”

Artificial intelligence experts say that there are many ways in which the government can be used from artificial intelligence, which is why it should be adopted carefully and conscience. Koglianz says that governments around the world, including the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, have faced problems with the executor of Amnesty, which were badly executed and that could make mistakes or show bias, and as a result of which it has been deprived of the wrong welfare of the population they need, for example.

In the United States, Michigan has faced a problem with artificial intelligence that was used to find fraud in the unemployment system when it incorrectly identified thousands of alleged fraud. Many of those benefits that have been rejected were treated harshly, including exposure to multiple penalties and accused of fraud. People were arrested and even asked for bankruptcy. After a five -year period, the state admitted that the regime was defective and after a year, it ended up recovering 21 million dollars to the residents who are wrongly accused of fraud.

Parthasaraathy says: “Most of the time, officials who buy and publish these technologies know little about how they work, their biases, restrictions, and mistakes,” Parthasaathy says. “Since low -income societies and marginalization otherwise tend to communicate with the most contact with governments through social services (such as the advantages of unemployment, care, and law enforcement), they tend to be affected more than artificial intelligence.”

Artificial intelligence also caused government problems when it is used in the courts to determine things such as the eligibility of a person’s conditional release or in the police stations when it is used to try to predict the place of the crime.

Schellmann says artificial intelligence used by police stations is usually trained in historical data from these departments, and this can cause artificial intelligence to recommend excess areas that have been overpowered for a long time, especially color societies.

Amnesty International does not understand anything

One of the problems that is likely to use artificial intelligence to replace workers in the federal government is that there are many different types of jobs in the government that require specific skills and knowledge. A person in the Ministry of Justice may have a completely different job from a job in the Ministry of Agriculture, for example, although they have the same job title. Therefore, the artificial intelligence program must be complex and very trained even to do a modest job in replacing a human worker.

“I don’t think you can cut the jobs of people randomly and then (replace them with any Amnesty International),” says Koglianz. “The tasks that the performance of these people were often specialized and very specific.”

Schellmann says you can use AI to do parts of someone’s job that may be expected or frequent, but you cannot completely replace someone. This will theory in theory if you want to spend years in developing the appropriate artificial intelligence tools to do a lot, and many types of different functions – a very difficult task and not what the government seems to be currently doing.

“These workers have a real experience and an accurate understanding of issues, which is not done by artificial intelligence. Parthasaathy says: Actually, do not understand” anything “. It is a use of mathematical methods to find patterns, based on historical data. Thus, it is likely to have a limited benefit, and even enhance historical biases. “

Administration of former US President Joe Biden Release In 2023, the executive was focused on the official use of Amnesty International in the government and how artificial intelligence will be tested and verified, but this matter was canceled by the Trump administration in January. Schellmann says this has made artificial intelligence be used with responsibility in the government or that researchers will be able to understand how artificial intelligence is used.

All of this was said, if artificial intelligence is developed responsibly, it may be very useful. Amnesty International can automate frequent tasks so that workers can focus on more important things or help workers solve the problems they are struggling with. But the time must be given time to publish in the right way.

“This does not mean that we cannot use artificial intelligence tools wisely,” says Koglianz. “But governments are destroying when they try to rush and do things quickly without the appropriate public inputs, comprehensive verification and verification of how the algorithm algasal works.”