Each extraordinary movie in the IMDB movie list is less rated

A long time before Marvel Studios started struggling with it Marvel Cinematic University (which may be better to die at this stageThere were some historical supernatural errors. The first real super film, “Superman” of 1978 It is still one of the greatest films in all ages, but even those that have been born in some doubtful sequences, thus a precedent for the best outstanding superhero films.

In the years that passed on the Christopher Reef fans, he persuaded their fans in the late seventies of the last century that a man could fly, we had some of the superhero matches. Upon properly finished, these films can offer the imagination of final escape, benefit from our group internal child and take us to ride excitement through our imagination. Or it can be “Adam Lions”. I am a child … a kind of. The problem embodied by this stunning reputation effort is that these films can often be just lazy, formula, loaded CGI. But even before the appearance of digital effects, there were many divorced superheroes. In reality, IMDBThe list of less -ranked films in all times includes six extraordinary films, and neither of them belongs to the modern green screen nightmare screen.

With the so -called super exquisite well and truly taking, there was no better time to look at these comic books and evaluate exactly what happened. Take into consideration, here are all superheroes in the IMDB lower movies list.

Although she did not make a movie worthy of her name, Catwoman had a fairly good history on the page and the screen. Michelle Phafer’s filming in favor of Batman, the beloved, is still an irreplaceable anti -two in the minds of those who grew up with Berton’s films, and Zoe Kravitz made the character proud of the “Batman”. But a single single picnic starring Haley Perry is still a remarkable stigma on this virgin record.

The 2004 “Catwoman” failure is well documented at this stage, to the extent that it does not deserve to analyze what is wrong with this famous failure of a movie. It goes without saying, no one really loves “Catwoman”, which currently holds 8 % shameful on spoiled tomatoes and sits 47th in the less rated IMDB classification. Classification of 3.4 on the basis of 129,000 votes is not just bad as you might expect for this movie, but it is definitely not great-although “Catwoman” is the highest classification among all the least-ranked superhero films here, and this is something … I think.

One point in the entire “Catwoman” disaster is that Haley Perry actually accepted the Razzie Award and then set fire to itShe appears at the 2005 party to thank Warner Bruce for “Casting (her) in this piece of S ** T” before announcing the audience. “My mother told me that if you could not be a good loser, there is no good winning way.” Unfortunately, there is nothing good about “CATWOMAN” although it is the highest in this miserable menu.

1997 was not a great year for super films. In the same year, Batman and Robin almost killed the film of the explicit comic book (more about it), Shakil O’Neill starred in an equal picnic, while being in a strange position in being a small enough project.

Perhaps Shack was the first step towards “steel” to become a box office fluctuation. The American professional league star, with a 7 -foot and 3 -inch, played the role of former arms world and army John Henry Airons, who after he was paralyzed in a work accident, was not wearing a cheap steel suit enough to betray the construction of unfortunate rubber when watching it on the big screen. Shak was in no way, when he agreed to the starring role in “Steel”, either, after he only faced two films in advance, neither of them earned a lot of money or led to any decisive praise.

Written and directed by Kenneth Johnson, who is famous for his work on TV programs such as “The Bionic Woman” and “The Incredible Hulk”, “Steel” saw the champion of Shaq in front of Jude Naton Nathaniel Burke in a feature described as a budget before San Francisco Cronic As “is acceptable for a movie”. This supernaturally budget cowardly effort, with some terrible shows, is only made $ 1.68 million At the global box office with a small budget already $ 16 million. As such, its place at the number 52 on the less -ranked IMDB menu, with a 3.0 classification based on 15,000 votes, may be a little better than it deserves.

A year after the redefinition of the movie “Batman” to Tim Burton to Forever Book Forever, Marvel decided that he would get “Captain America”, a project of $ 3 million that was initially supposed to cost $ 40 million but achieved some major financial problems during production and witnessed his theatrical ambitions. Since then, the feature directed to Albert Pion has become a honeymoon footnote in the history of Marvel on the screen, even if it was absolutely remembered. By all standards, then, I forgot ‘captain America “in the nineties of the last century a disaster … or is it?

Well, yes. This is a film that includes a plot in which the red paculin is actually responsible for the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King. Otherwise, there is a lot in “Captain America” ​​similar to the effort of Marvel Studios “Captain America: The First Avenger”, at least in terms of Steve Rogers (Matt Salinger), which extends after a dose of the super soldier and becomes the complete hero during World War II. Otherwise, this film belongs to an unimaginable time when Marvel licenses were everywhere and the company was heading towards bankruptcy (one of the prominent landmarks that it eventually struck in 1996) while the capital remained ruler of Superhero.

Despite talking about a more trial alternative cut that looks better in a marginal way than the audience of the direct version to the video that was received in 1990, “Captain America” ​​is still greatly believed as a big mistake in the history of the comic movie-which is embodied by rating in 77 with 3.2 rating based on 16,000 votes in the IMDB menu.

There are a lot of entries in this list are Curios or the disappointments that you quickly shake, but “Batman & Robin” belongs to the category that we call “historical Blrenders”. This is a movie not only to kill the Batman concession, but the exile films that were ignored by its star, George Clooney.

Directed by Joel Schumacher, he took the 1997 entry into the Batman story, everything is bad for “Batman forever” for the year 1995, which already remains Batman, which has been ignored more than the pioneer than you realizeAnd she reduced up to 100 Tim Burton “strange experience” Batman Odeh “ -“Batman & Robin” was basically one long commercial game that overcomes jokes that deserve to be groaned and some of the worst representations that adhere to the screen.

Although it is placed as one of the worst superheroes of the superhero ever, it is not as if you did not like about “Batman & Robin”. In fact, the city of Gotham was presented in an impressive way in this movie, and the production design as a whole was a technical achievement of some kind. But in contrast, this is one film that is completely worthy of its place in the list of the less -ranked IMDB films, currently located on the number 82 with a 3.8 rating on the basis of 275,000 votes.

Fortunately, Christopher Nolan was saving Batman’s story in 2005 with the excellent “Batman Begins”, but for a long time it looked like “Batman & Robin” the dark knight fell forever.

It is difficult to exaggerate the exaggeration of the “Superman” effect of 1978 on the films of superheroes. It was not just that the popularity of the movie prompted him to become the first superhero, director Richard Donner spent two years of his life Dealing with the topic with a kind of reverence that was in the years before the launch of the film seemed funny. Doner was a real respect for Superman as a character and played his movie as a love message for a steel man and superheroes as a whole, which leads to the legitimacy of this type of super films at a time when nothing was simply.

Of course, “Superman” was a great success, which means that Warner Bruce quickly took out as possible as possible. In fact, “Superman II” was a good follow -up, which is currently the third The highest -ranked superman movie on IMDBWith 6.8 degrees and 118,000 votes. However, the movie “Superman IV: The Quest for People” for the year 1987 at the other end of the scale, as it reached 86 in the least -rated IMDB menu with 3.7 degrees based on 55,000 rating, making it less rated in all films in this list.

“Superman IV” is one of a handful of Mooned hero films that actors regret. Like George Clooney with “Batman & Robin”, star Christopher Reef donated mainly to its fourth in Cape, describing the film in his autobiography in 1999 as such: “It was said less about” Superman IV, “that was better.” Director Sydney did not come. Immediately to anywhere near the highlands that Donner achieved in his original effort, making a film that he tested very badly, and was ordered to estimate about half an hour of footage before Warner agreed to get out of it. The faded villain in the form of a nuclear man in Mark did not help a cushion and troubled production accused of re -creation of Metropolis in English industrial gardens, in the end, in the end, one of the worst super films remains ever.