Dyson Airwrab opposite Shark FlexFusion: I have tested both hair tools on my long, thick, and crowned hair. There was an unexpected winner

A few high -tech hair tools are mentioned in the way Dyson Airwrab works when it comes to high -tech hair tools. It is elegant, well designed and yes, expensive. But in recent years, new, A more affordable competitor Raising the spotlight: flexible shark. Both brands are the results of the salon quality at home with less heat damage.

After testing each of the hairdressing tools for a few weeks, I found that despite their promise to similar results, each of them works better for different types of hair. For the purpose of this article, I separated my hair to the bottom and a half with Dyson Airwrap and the other half with FlexFusion Shark. I wore the results throughout the day, tested for size and size, and noticed how each side stood the next morning.

How do these hair tools work

At first glance, it appears that Dyson Airwrap and Shark FlexFusion are the same results. Both are multi -designed tools that dry, shaved, and soft hair size using a rapid air flow instead of severe heat. Both design tools use what is known as the effect of Coanda, a technique in which the natural curve of the surface is followed. It allows your hair to wrap around the barrel without rotating parts or clamps.

Dyson opposite the shark: comparison schedule

feature	Dyson Airwrab	Flexible shark
price	$ 599	$ 349
Incorded accessories	6	4
Heat settings	2 heat settings + cold snapshot	3 heat settings + cold shot
technology	Kwanda effect	Kwanda effect
The length of the rope	8.5 feet	8.0 feet
Budget hair types	Mostly for the smooth hair to the average	It works well on all kinds of hair, including thick and frizzy

The first test: a poetic calendar with both tool

To somewhat compare it, I performed a real test side by side. I separated from my hair below the center and arrest half of it with a dyson and the other half with a Fusion Shark brush, and both tools are at the top of the heat circumference.

I removed the shark my roots much better than Dyson. It took longer to straighten my hair with Dyson because I had to do more passes near my scalp, and still did not reject the folder as well as the shark. On the ends, the shark also gave elegance and more polished. I expected Dyson to do better, but the shark brush is designed to give you a more explosive look and a more DYSON brush for strict integrity. The shark is certainly holding my thick waves firmly firmly and formed with a better tension.

I must make a note to the levels of noise. The shark is more noisy than Dison. Sometimes, I felt the need to use earplugs when designing near my ear with shark. Dyson’s performance quietly performed.

Dyson side:

• The hairs on the homogeneous brush are transmitted from side to side, which avoids withdrawing hair and prevents breakage. This gentle movement made my hair feel soft.
• My hair did not dominate firmly as I wish, leaving visual waves near the roots. If your roots are straight, this will not be a problem. But with deep waves, curls or files, you may need several passes or round brush to fully correct them.
• The ends were good but lacking definition and elegance.

Shark side:

• The merge brush on my hair has better captured and provided more tension, giving the roots and ending with a more elegant look. For this reason, I had to do less passes, and cut off the drying time by about 10 minutes compared to Dison.
• The air flow seemed stronger, which also contributed to a faster drying time.
• In general, the end result with the shark appeared to be a professional explosion.

Judgment: For this part of the test, Shark was the clear winner of my long -being. Half of Shark looked similar to the best (as if I had finished it professionally), without damage to heat. However, if you have good hair with less texture, Dyson should give you great results.

The second test: the use of window bars

After a hair side calendar with homogeneity and fusion brushes, the attachments of each net tool tested. I have used Airwrap Curling Curling on one side – the software of insomnia, not the fish that gives more the appearance of the explosion. This was the side that was frozen with a homogeneous brush. On the other side, which dried up with a fusion brush, I used FlexFusion Shark. Both the tool contains dry or wet settings, so you use them on the highest preparation for dry hair.

Direct off the bat, Dyson earns Brownie points for one reverse curl. Switching shaved trends makes it easier – you only have to twist the top of the barrel. The Airwrap version requires the oldest separate barrels to wander in different directions.

FlexFusion Shark uses two separate netting bars, each of which is characterized by arrows to indicate the direction of air flow. This makes Dyson more convenient – you just need one barrel, not bars, and faster to use. With sharks, you should switch bars to design each side of your head, and you often have to wait until they cool them first. I often found them very hot to deal with it.

Dyson side:

• This aspect of my hair was more strict and more defined
• Hallow trend was easier to control due to the option of one -band key
• Air flow and barrels felt much more on Khuti, with less clouds and clouds (better for medium hair)
• The curls were more organized and classic, which I find more suitable for official methods or long corrosion
• Dyson also comes with curls sizes, 1.2 inches and 1.6 inches, so you can determine whether you want to curl more or more flexible hair. My experience with the larger barrel is that it does not give you a permanent, shaved look, but rather a more explosive wave.

Shark side:

• He gave more flexible, devoted curls with more movement
• The air flow was stronger, so I had to spend less time in my hair
• Bars and air flow had a better grip on my hair (better for thick or tight hair)
• The curls had a softer and more lively fabric, and I find it better for an informal appearance

Judgment: If you want accuracy and comfort or have good to medium hair, Dyson is the best option. On the other hand, if you want more curls, apostasy, thick or tight apostasy, the shark is the best option.

DYSON AIRWRAP opposite Shark FlexFusion: Other attachments included

The most common tools used for both sharks and DYSON are nettles and integrity attachments, but both brands offer additional attachments to add ingenuity to routine. Here are details of the tools that each one provides:

Dyson Airwrab attachments

• Airwrap conical (for severe curls)
• 1.6 -inch AIRWRAP barrel (for curls)
• Dried and flyaway more smooth
• Quick dryer
• Big brush round
• Smooth smooth brush

Prefabble meals: Dyson gives you more customization attachments that meet the exact design and polished results. The Flyaway facility is really highlighted to polish curly hair.

Flexible sharks attachments

The Shark FlexFization is a brown package that comes with a fusion brush and ceramic reliability (such as Flatiron), and your choice of two other elbows. For me, I chose the window bars and the design vehicle so I can also use it as a hand dryer. You can choose two of the following:

• 1.25 “automatic rollers
• Oval brush
• The publisher definition of the publisher
• The finishing tool for the Frizz fighter
• Boring comb
• Concentrate design

Prefabble meals: Shark gives priority to efficiency, where you can choose the tools you will actually use. You will get the basics of your design needs, so it is not about endless combinations and more on practical application.

Which is better: Airwrap or FlexFusion Shark?

As a person with a thick and tight hair color, I know very well that most hair care tools are built with a more accurate hairpiece. I think both tools can work with all kinds of hair, with some caveats.

Dyson Airwrab feels more installment, but you will need to divide and smaller style of hair and will require more passes (and more time) to get polished results on thick hair (even at the highest preparation). For soft hair, you may be away from larger sections.

The shark takes over my folder without effort and gives a more elegant look at my roots and ends. I think the highest preparation may be very strong for soft hair, so it is better to use a more nice setting to avoid fracture.

Dison AirwRAP positives and negatives

Pros:

• Feeling and luxurious design
• Wonderful for severe curls and soft explosions
• Decreased heat, which makes it safer for daily use

cons:

• Struggle with thick or curly roots
• Price
• It takes more time for thick hair

The pros and cons of negatives

Pros:

• Better tension and capture thick, wavy or curly hair
• More smooth results for roots and ends
• Faster design
• More at reasonable prices

cons:

• Web bars require you to replace them with different air flow directions
• Air flow with a louder than Dyson

The final ruling

If you have long, thick, curly, or wavy hair like me, FlexFusion Shark may be the best option for you. It provides faster results, leads to softening both roots and ends more effectively – and does everything to break the price of Dyson Airwrap.

However, Dyson is a pioneer in the world of hair care for a good reason. If you want more polished paddies, I love the luxury experience, or from Dyson’s lovers or you have good to medium hair, it is certain that it is worth boasting.

If we are objectively looking for performance alone, especially the tool that will work well on all kinds of hair, then FlexFization Shark FlexFization is really impressive.