Donald Trump’s pledge against the war was tested as Israel’s attack on the Maga Iran base

Donald Trump won the United States elections last year and promised to be a president of peace. As America is now exposed to traction to a new war between Israel and Iran, this pledge appears to be increasingly hollow.

Trump The famous campaign said that he can easily resolve the conflict in Gaza, use diplomacy to stop the Iranian nuclear program and end the war between Russia and Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office.

In his speech in victory last November, he said: “They said,” He will start a war. “I will not start a war, I will stop wars.”

It was a message that witnessed a tremendous call to American voters who are tired of contracts of US military interventions in the Middle East and Afghanistan – clashes that seem to be Trump often referred to Trump in the name of “Wars forever”.

However, fear grows between the Savior Maga base in Trump Israel strikes against Iran On Thursday night, an anti-war president will be brought up in another foreign military tangle-this time among the largest military forces in the Middle East.

Steve Bannon, the chief strategy in Trump during his first term, said that American and Israeli interests were not necessarily identical in the current crisis.

He said: “They (the Israelis) are Israel first, we need to always be America first.” “In Jerusalem, they must think about the message of Christ: they live with the sword, die with a sword.”

In financial times, he asked whether he was afraid that the United States would be dragged into a war with Iran, he answered: “A lot.”

It is a fear that is widely shared among Trump’s supporters, as concerns grow that it is outside the missile attacks on Israel on Friday afternoon, Tehran may also reach American military origins in the region. “Israel is trying to make Iran attack us just like your ex -husband, who has tried some elegant in a bar to fight you,” Books on x.

“Is it about to be absorbed in another war in the Middle East?” Jack Buswobic, the right -wing media personality, said. “Because this is exactly the opposite.

Posobiec was talking about ThoughtA video table hosted by the right -wing influencer Charlie Kirk, just as the details of the Israeli strikes occurred. Both indicated that the Israeli action will put the alarm bells between the Trump base.

“This will be terrible online Maga,” Kirk said. “You will see – I don’t want to say a civil war, but it will be a battle online (which) will be very difficult to move.”

Kirk later to publish Falcons will urge the United States to “finish mullahs”. But he warned: “America’s interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya were all easy at first. It was in the months and years that followed that it had become expensive swamps.

“If you can summarize President Trump’s campaign since 2024, my election will prevent World War III,” said Tyler Bouer, a conservative Turning Point Usa.

“I had one of the biggest promises of Trump” with me you’ll get a less war-I am the anti-war president. ”

Matthew Boyle, head of the Washington office on the right -wing popular news site, Beripart, said Trump is facing an unstable balanced work, and prevents the United States from a wider war while continuing to support Israel, one of America’s closest allies, and ensuring that Iran is never obtaining a nuclear bomb.

“What he does from here can determine his presidency,” he said. “But if there is anyone who can deal with such a risky situation, it is President Trump.”

The complexity of matters for President Maga supporters was the fog of uncertainty about Trump’s real position in the Israeli attack. In late May, he said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned against attacking Iran while Washington was negotiating with Tehran on a nuclear deal.

This initially prompted some observers to speculate that Netanyahu had gone against us desires to launch his attack, which is a strengthened impression of Foreign Minister Marco Rubio, who said that the United States did not participate and described strikes as “unilateral action” by Israel.

But Friday, Trump came to support the Israeli strikes, and told the Wall Street Journal that Washington knew it in advance. They were called “the greatest thing ever for the market” because they will stop Iran from developing “a nuclear weapon that represented a major threat to humanity.”

Sajar Ingéti, the right -wing strait in the opposition, said that Trump has now praised the Israeli strike and confirmed the American and Israeli material support, as it was offering his general opposition. The score of collapse. “In other words, Trump, not Israel, sarcastically all of us (who) wanted us to avoid this war.”

But Boyle Boyls said he believed a firm belief in Trump’s goal of a historic deal to end Iran Nuclear program It can still be on hand, despite the Israeli attack – and that the chances of occurrence have now increased.

“If there is anything, what Israel did strengthen Trump’s hand in negotiations with the Iranians,” he said. “It may create influence that was not before.”

This was repeated by Trump’s comments. In an interview with Dana Bash from CNN on Friday, he said that the Iranian “militants” that the United States was dealing with in nuclear negotiations were “dead”.

Bash asked her if Israel had killed them, he replied, “They did not die from the influenza.”