The Massachusetts Institute says Lotion
The relevant paper wrote, “Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Discovery, and Product Innovation”, by a PhD student in the university’s economy program. He claimed that he explained that the introduction of the artificial intelligence tool into the large non -specific material science laboratory led to the discovery of more materials and more patent files, but at the expense of reducing the satisfaction of those looking for their work.
Massachusetts Institute of Economic Technology Darwin Asimoglu (which recently He won the Nobel PrizeDavid Outor praised the paper last year, with Autor tell Wall Street Journal It was “land”. In a statement included in Announcement of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Friday, Acemoglu and Autor described the paper as “already known and widely discussed in literature related to AI and Science, although it was not published in any specific magazine.”
However, the two economists said that they are now “have no confidence in the source of the data source, its reliability, or the validity of the data and the validity of the research.”
According to wsjThe computer world with experience in material science is close to ACEMOGLU and Autor with concerns in January. They brought those concerns to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which led to an internal review.
The Massachusetts Institute says L -Likak Pre -layer version of the paper The coverage of the initial press determines the author as Aidan Toner-Rodgers. (TECHCRUNCH Communication with ink ink for comment.)
The Massachusetts Institute of Knnn says that only the authors of the paper are able to submit ARXIV withdrawal requests, but the Massachusetts Institute of Technology says, “So far, the author has not done so,” says the Massachusetts Institute of Knn.
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/GettyImages-1497617145-1.jpg?resize=1200,800
Source link