Disney had a controversial plan for the role of Moana in Dwayne Johnson (but she failed miserably)

As much as they want from the Silicon Valley, pressure groups, and generous executives, to believe you that AI is an inevitable future, we have finally reached the point where the Public Opinion Court has a real impact on the use of artificial intelligence-at least when it comes to Hollywood. This means, continued to use “Clanker” (the term cloning soldiers who are used to indicate the battle of robots in “Star Wars: Reproduction Wars”) as a humiliating term for robots and AI, and they continued to call it as bad as the studio threatens to use the technique of killing the environment.

For example, Disney did not have two great attempts to include artificial intelligence in the big budget, and prominent films closed for fear of repercussions (whether legal or from the opinion of the public). The news comes from Wall Street JournalIn a report on Disney, who is trying to circumvent the busy schedule of Dwayne Johnson while making it The live movie “Moana” Using artificial intelligence to digitally cloning Johnson when it cannot be in the group.

The plan was to use Johnson’s cousin, Tanoai Reed (who has already worked in Johnson’s dual trick since “The Scorpion King”) as a double body and then Metaphys (AIWho worked on Robert Zimikis “here”) To create Deepfakes from Johnson’s face to be placed at the head of Reed’s performance. Despite spending 18 months negotiating with metaphysics after Johnson agreed to the plan, and spending those who know the amount of money to try to get out of paying VFX artists to do so What they were doing for yearsDisney canceled the dual idea of the entire digital body. The logic was that Disney executives were concerned that the studio “could not claim the ownership of every element of the film if AI created parts of it.”

Ironically, Disney screams simultaneously to find ways to implement artificial intelligence in her films to save a few dollars while trying to prevent others from using their films with artificial intelligence. After all, the studio sued Amnesty International last month to train artificial intelligence on Disney ownership (across BBC) At the same time, players allow the players to interact with Ai Darth Vader on “Fortnite”. According to WSJ, the studio is looking to add a feature to Disney+ that would allow subscribers to create their own clips from Disney offers using artificial intelligence-at the same time does not allow screenshots from the broadcast platform to get ridiculous Mimi. According to the report, the studio heads began to fear the repercussions of artificial intelligence more than they like their capabilities, especially studios such as Disney, whose IP address is above all. There are also incoming contract negotiations with unions, which leads to the closure of studio heads of artificial intelligence experiences “for fear of angering business unions.”

This, of course, is excellent news. The unions did not strike only two years ago For this particular reasonBut every time artificial intelligence is used in a movie or show, it was disastrous – like Matthew “Cobra Kai” destroyed his last season for him.

Bigness works, just ask “TON: Ares”. According to WSJ, Disney has canceled a plan to integrate artificial intelligence of a soldier’s character that enters the real world of the virtual world. Since the film revolves around artificial intelligence, Execs wanted to use artificial intelligence as part of the tumultuous marketing strategy. Fortunately, Disney killed the idea when “CEOs were informed internally that the company was unable to risk bad advertising.”

Yes, Amnesty International will not disappear without any trace. Studios are very greedy and very bright while lowering costs to ignore them. However, it is the power of the masses that can make Amnesty International a long part of filmmaking, such as sound and color, or a short -term innovation like “Avatar”.