Disney Company and Universal Sue Ai Midjournyy to violate copyright

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Disney and Universal filed a lawsuit for copyright against Midjourney, on the occasion of the first time the major Hollywood companies entered the legal battle on artificial intelligence.

The complaint was submitted at the Federal Provincial Court in Los Angeles on Wednesday, and the complaint claims the Hollywood Studios libraries to generate and distribute “unauthorized copies of them” from their famous personalities, such as Dartheter from Star Wars And the dependencies from Relative.

“Midjourney is the free passenger traveler and the perfect patch and a bottom hole. Piracy is piracy, and whether the violating image or video is made of artificial intelligence or another technology that does not make it less violating,” the companies mentioned in the complaint.

Studios also claimed that the artificial intelligence company is based in San Francisco ignored its requests to stop violating its work and publishing rights and taking technological measures to stop this images.

Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.

Watch | The effect of artificial intelligence on the creative industry:

How does artificial intelligence affect the creative media industry?

For many, artificial intelligence is a tool. For others, it represents plagiarism and theft of intellectual property. Lorelei Pepi, Animation Professor at Emily Car University in Vancouver, joins Dan Burit in a conversation to dismantle the impact of artificial intelligence on the creative sector.

In an interview with the year 2022 with the Associated Press, Midjourney CEO David Hones described the photo -making service as “like the search engine”, as he withdraws a wide range of online images. He compared copyright fears about technology with how to adapt such laws to human creativity.

“Can a person look at another person’s image, learn from him and make a similar picture?” Hones said. “It is clear that people are permitted, and if not, it will destroy the entire professional art industry. Perhaps the non -professional industry as well. To the extent that AIS learns like people, this is a kind of the same thing, and if the pictures come out differently, they look good.”

The main artificial intelligence developers usually do not reveal their data sources, but they have argued that taking text from texts, images and other media that can be accessed to the public is protected through the “fair use” doctrine of the American Publishing and Publishing Law.

The issue of studios joins an increasing number of lawsuits filed against the developers of artificial intelligence platforms – such as Openai and Anthropic – in San Francisco and New York.

Meanwhile, the first great copyright experience of the artificial intelligence industry is taking place in London, where Getty Images is incited against the AI’s artificial intelligence company.



https://i.cbc.ca/1.7558435.1749663412!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/disney-hulu.jpg?im=Resize%3D620

Source link

Leave a Comment