The Delhi Supreme Court has issued a directive to the Amazon and Flipkart e -commerce giants to delete products that violate the brands “Relnce” and “JIO”. This matter, which was approved by Judge Surab Pandraji on July 10, restricts the sellers to use these brands without permission, according to Bar and Council. This step comes after lifting the Rellence Industries Limited (RIL) on the pretext that many sellers were violating their brands on online platforms.
The dynamic judge of Panerry justice aims to reduce the unauthorized use of Reliace brands, which claims to mislead consumers to believe that these products arise from the company. The court realized that this distortion could lead to the risk of consumer safety due to confusion about the origin of the products. This ruling follows Rail that it is active in the fast -moving consumer commodity sector (FMCG), and deals with fresh products and other groceries through various channels.
The court stressed the importance of protecting names and commercial slogans, especially on the Internet, as consumers depend heavily on these identifiers. Consumer’s confusion has been cited as a great concern. “Moreover, the defendant’s products are sold to 21 through the online e -commerce platforms where consumers depend on the brand name and slogans to determine the origin of the goods, in such circumstances, if there is any confusion between these products, if it is allowed to continue, it can risk the safety of the consumer.
The legal representation of Ril was dealt with by ANKIT SANI and Kritika Sahni defenders, along with their partners from Ajay Sahni & Associates. Legal procedures included many defendants represented by various legal companies, all of which deal with allegations of trademarks. The decision of the Critical Nature Court hall to preserve the brand’s safety in the competitive scene of e -commerce is highlighted.
https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/businesstoday/images/story/202507/more-than-350-trade-leaders-in-a-unanimous-resolution-pointed-towards-alleged-irregularities-in-the-294125286-original-sixteen-to-nine.jpg
Source link