Deepfake from the deceased man gives his impact statement in court

Deepfake, which was created from the artificial intelligence of the Rage Rage victim of AI, gave his influence statement in the court in the defense pronunciation session, . This is the first time that technology has been used in this way.

The idea of ​​using a copy of the artificial intelligence came from the victim, Christopher Bilky, from his family, according to a spokesman for the Marikuba County Lawyer Office. Bilky’s sister said that she was writing a two -year influence statement, but she found what she had to say “does not seem to do justice” for his memory. Pelkey ​​was shot and killed in 2021 during the road anger.

So the idea of ​​bringing in Deepfake was born. Bilky’s sister wrote the scenario, CNN news She was sure, “This is what he would think of.” The Supreme Court judge in Marikuba Tod Lang County agreed to the idea and the family played a video of Bilky, who was created from artificial intelligence in the court. In the video, it seemed that the avatar asked for leniency when judging his killer. The defendant was convicted of wrongful killing and exposure earlier this year.

“For Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot Ali: It is a shameful thing to face each other on that day in those circumstances.” “In another life, we may have been friends. I believe in forgiveness.”

However, the judge issued the maximum sentence for more than 10 years in prison. “I heard forgiveness,” he said about the synthesis of artificial intelligence. “I feel that this was real, and that his clear remission of Mr. Horcasitas reflects the character I heard about (Bilky) today.”

The defense stated that the artificial intelligence show creates a strong issue of appeal. Defense lawyer, Jason Lam, said: “While the judges definitely suffer from the presentation of what must be heard, especially from the victims, the Court of Appeal will have to decide whether this is a mistake,” Defense lawyer, Jason Lam, said. The case has already been re -tried for procedural cases.

The law professor at Arizona State Gary Marshant, a specialist in ethical and emerging technologies, is concerned about the legal precedents specified here.

And he told NBC News. “So this is an additional leap that I feel will enter into serious reasons.”