Founder of SPORTS Barstool Dave Porto It sparked a hot discussion after its weight Jimmy KimmelSudden cancellation. After ABC decision to withdraw “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” After the controversial notes of the host late at night Charlie KerkAn assassination, Portoi moved to X (previously Twitter) to argue that Kimmel’s launch is not actually qualified as “Congle Culture”. His comments soon became viral, reactions, support and a lot of fiery debate were received about the place where the separation line lies between the culture of cancellation and freedom of expression and consequences.
The article below the advertisement continues
Dave Burtoy speaks after Jimmy Kimmel news cancellation
In his position, Portinoy argued that Jimmy Kimmel’s launch is not actually qualified as a cancellation culture:
“With Kimmel’s instruction, I see many people talking about the hypocrisy of the cancellation of culture. For me, the cancellation of culture is when people come out through them to dig old tweets and videos, etc. then this person is punished for that, and this does not eliminate culture.
Burnoy’s position divided social media immediately, as some discrimination and others tear it as the division of poetry.
The article below the advertisement continues
Critics shoot

One of the viral response mocked the logic of Portnawi, “so let me get this straight. If the mobs punish you for the old tweets, this is the cancellation of culture. But if the mobs punish you in real time, this is justice. Yes.
Another user accused Portnoy of “re -invention of Pitchfork ethics”, saying: “You think this does not eliminate culture because the anger came quickly. But the flash mob with WiFi is still a charming experience. What you defend is digital implementation with fresh time stamps.”
Others accumulated by accusations that Portinoi was normalizing “algorithm ethics”, which is the idea that popular anger via the Internet is now working as a judge, an arbitration paradise, and management.
The article below the advertisement continues
Jimmy Kimmel’s supporters defend freedom

Not everyone does not agree. Some defended Jimmy Kimmel, insisting not to confront the cancellation of the controversial materials at all, regardless of timing.
“I don’t agree,” one of the users wrote. “Return through old functions is part of the cancellation culture, and there must be a law of restrictions on all this fake anger of the old content, and we agree on there, but comedians should not be canceled for jokes in an actual time as well. Even those bad. Even those inaccurate.
The article below the advertisement continues
Government angle

For others, the case was not at all tense, but about who pressed ABC to work. Many of the FCC Brendan Car chair indicates that Disney may lose licenses if Jimmy Kimmel is not punished.
“You are right. This is not the abolition of culture. It’s much worse. It is the government that threatens revenge unless ABC gets rid of Kimmel. This is a direct violation of freedom of expression,” a person has argued.
Another added, “It does not matter what you call. It is important that it was canceled due to government pressure, which came through the Federal Communications Committee – this is a problem.”
The article below the advertisement continues
The repercussions of the removal of Jimmy Kimmel

After a violent reaction escalated, ABC announced on Wednesday that “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” It will be “an indefinite time.” The decision was followed by the NexStar step to drop the offer via 28 ABC companies, a sign that the station pressure was intense. The insiders also revealed that at least another major group had expressed its objections, which raised the possibility that the broader rebellion between local stations helped pushing the network to act. The result was one of the most escalating TV at night in the years.
According to a source spoke with Hollywood ObserverKimmel was ready to address the controversy in Wednesday night broadcast. According to what was stated, the viewers were stated through his statements and explained how they were removed from the context. The source added that Kimmel had no intention to apologize, because he believes that his comments do not guarantee one.
Whether it is framed that the abolition of culture, consequences, or government intervention, the overthrow of Kimmel has become a point of discussion, and it is likely to be crowned through Hollywood, the media, and the broader discussion on freedom of expression in America.
Source link
https://theblast.prod.media.wordpress.mattersmedia.io/brand-img/123/1300×600/2025/09/18113426/dave-portnoy-jimmy-kimmel.jpg?