Daclab says he can remove carbon dioxide using less electricity than many competitors

The countries of the world may have pledged to reduce carbon pollution, but with the arrival of global emissions Ever Last year, they decreased a lot.

The drilling of this opening will require carbon removal directly from the atmosphere. But it comes with a huge price sign, mostly due to the required energy. Remove one metric ton from CO₂ It is expected that the use of direct air capture requires About 2000 kWh an hour From electricity when technology is sorted and expanded.

One emerging company called DacLab says it is already doing it for less. Aditya Bahandari, co -founder and executive director of DaclabTell Techcrunch.

Dackel, which has been working in a way that has been created over the past four years, has appeared today with $ 3 million of seed financing, the company expressed exclusively Techcrunch. The tour was led by early investor Peter Rilan with the participation of the co -founder of Silver Lake Dev Rocks, Wovenerth Ventures Jane Woodward, and others.

In most direct air capture charts, air is detonated on a solid material capable of absorbing carbon dioxide. As the material is saturated, carbon dioxide should be launched so that it can be pulled and stored elsewhere. Co launch process₂ It tends to be intense for energy, however, it involves the heat around it often 80 ° C to 120 ° C. (Liquid material requires more heat.)

To reduce construction costs, many startups take steps to capture and release in the same square. On the other hand, Daclab separates Monday, holds one place and launches carbon dioxide in another. Handari said the heat is relatively low for solid guilt, about 70 ° C. most

The charged preparation is often found in industrial sites, which contains the exhaust currents more concentrated. DACLAB technology of these industrial designs has been reused. (Another emerging, global thermostat, which was recently Parts are soldAlso used division design.)

DACLAB technology comes from Tu Wein in Austria, where it has produced a partnership with the Carbon capture unit from the sources that have been operated nearly three years ago. “This is very unusual, when you compare it to many other research groups,” Bahandari said, noting that it was the largest carbon capture facility in Austria at the time.

It took the start of this technology and modified it for the duty to capture direct air. Daclab has built two units capable of capturing 100 metric tons annually, and has plans to build versions capable of capturing 1000 and 5,000 metric tons annually. The previous one will be published first in Washington, while the latter will be installed in Kenya.

Bahandari said that the company sells a unit of 100 tons of less than 500,000 dollars. Ultimately, DacLAB hopes to provide units for oil and gas companies, carbon project developers and companies that make electronic aircraft aircraft.

In the end, a lot of carbon capture cost depends on the amount of energy you use. Dacland has plans to reduce consumption to less than 1000 kW per hour per metric ton. If this happens, the company says it will be able to capture carbon dioxide for $ 250 per metric ton.

“We will not be one of the directing companies that promise you that we will reach 100 dollars per ton (Mitri) today,” Bhandari said. “I hope we can restart this industry, which is intensified, because it is full of many empty promises.”