Customs tariff strategy is reverse results and small companies are side damage

The White House only He concluded the victory roll For the Small National Business Week, with talking about “launching opportunities” and “Pro-Growth”. But this is the thing: If you have already operated a company in the past five years, and not only wrote a letter about one, you know that this is not how any of this does.

Let’s skip the rotation. Definitions do not protect small companies. They punish them. Quietly, constantly, and with the effect of the compound.

Definitions are not a smart tool for the stadium stadium leveling. It is a quiet tax that makes everything more difficult, especially for small companies that already move in a minefield of high costs, broken supply chains, and work pressure. While political leaders draw a picture of the main street revival, the view of the store front is completely different. Prices rise. Unpredictable supply chains. The margins are shrinking. Now, the federal government wants a round of applause to slap another tax on less -equipped people to absorb it.

National Office for Economic Research (NBER) Ticket I found that the additional cost of definitions is completely transferred to US importers. This means that the burden does not fall on foreign competitors, as it is located on American companies, especially the smaller companies that have lower sophisticated margins and leverage. Most small companies do not have backup, global negotiating power suppliers or financial runway to accommodate these shocks.

Definitions are not a strategy. They are structural sabotage

The logic behind definitions is always the same: punishing unfair foreign trade practices, protecting the local industry, and stimulating local growth. The administration’s argument is that the customs tariff “will bring jobs to the home” and reduce foreign accreditation. Theoretical, perhaps. In practice, what they really do is to plant chaos in supply chains, delay production and force business owners to make impossible choices. Raising prices and the risk of customer loss? Or eat costs and hope to survive another quarter?

This is not an opportunity. This is a trap.

Ironically, it helps the same companies demand verification. Amazon Increased cost can be swallowed. Wal Mart Shipping can be redirected. But the family -owned coffee reserve needs imported equipment to stay competitive? They left to hold the bag.

Definitions are not related to the creation of fairness. They create barriers, especially for small companies trying to get out of the ground.

For companies in the early stage, definitions affect more than the end result

In any situation in which you feel that VCS feels a systematic risk of economy, it is difficult to make them open their check books. Strain companies need many capital tours, and if there is a perception that future rounds will be difficult to obtain, you will need more condemnation to make investment.

But with the customs tariff, you also have to take into account unknown about profit modeling. How do you fund any comfortable consumer product that requires raw materials when long -term costs of any of these companies are unknown? Or evaluate the potential of demand if it is part of the bullish trend of work internationally?

Here is how we are In reality Help small companies

If political makers actually want to strengthen small companies, they must focus on what the owners really ask:

Low input costs. This means fewer hidden taxes, and no more.
Reliable supply chains. We need an investment in infrastructure, not a disguised disorder as an ewsee.
Access to credit at reasonable prices. High rates, and the capital is narrow. Entrepreneurs cannot grow.
Politics stability. You cannot plan to launch a product or sign a rental contract when the rules continue to change every week.

Perhaps above all: it includes small business owners in the policy industry. Don’t just review them within weeks under the title.

I am all to protect the American Foundation. But you do not do this by making it more expensive to manage a company in America. Do not do it by forcing entrepreneurs to pay more for less. Certainly, do not do this by pretending that the cost enlargement is winning.

Definitions may record political points. But it fails to politics wrapped in a national package. They weaken people who claim to be a hero.

The small work week may end, but our attention should not deviate from the importance of these growing institutions. If we want to support the backbone of the economy, we must stop its weight.

The opinions expressed in cutting comments Fortune.com are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions and beliefs luck.

Read more: