Companion continues a more related horror direction than ever

This article contains Spoilers To “Rafik”.

In 1985, John Hughes, the Scientific Sex Comedy, brought out “strange science”, about two teenage boys using a great computer to generate Final Dream Girl (Kelly Liberok plays). The following year, Wes Cravin put a “killer friend”, where a teenager refused to accept that the girl who was crushing had become fatal in the brain, and planted a robot processor to return it. The following year, Pamela Gidli starred in the role of the science fiction “Cherry 2000”, where society has become in the 2017 non -sexual future, but it is absent from that intimate relationship that Gynoids has become a dominant alternative to wives.

And robotics girlfriends are not new, with “The Twilight Zone” to study psychology behind humans who find romantic bonds and emotional loyalty with Androids in the 1959 episode, “The Lonely”. But with the continued technology in progress and closer to the tenderness of the comrades of artificial intelligence as an imagined concept, we began to see the repercussions of real life to believe that the future is female as long as it is programmed. “Creating an ideal partner controls it and meets all your needs is really scary.” Guardian. “Given what we already know is that gender -based violence drivers are those inherent cultural beliefs that men can control, and this is really a problem.”

When the accompanying app was launched in 2023, it came with the slogan “Control it along the way you want”, and some men have He already admitted to the verbal abuse of their virtual friends. This raises anxiety, slightly. The friends of the tangible, sins and realistic robots are inevitable, but the single consolation that I have in this awakening that we call life is that if the unsafe losers who prefer to control a robot friend instead of spending Nano emotional competence, improving the health of hygiene, or Developing the social skills and sympathy necessary to deserve the partner will get what they want – those robots will fight one day.

If there is any justice in this world, it will look like Rafik Bot Iris, who escapes from her abusive boyfriend, Josh In “Rafik”.

When we meet for the first time in Iris (SophieTcher) in “Rafik”, she remembers her meeting with Josh (Jack Kyud), the man who thinks her boyfriend but he is already accompanied by her. The meeting is nothing more than a memory programmer to help IRIS to develop a background story. It slowly pushes a shopping cart under the corridors in a grocery store heading towards the production department when Josh accidentally knocks on a full orange display that tries to present himself to it. It is the story of “How We Meet” is so adorable that it became vulgar, to the extent that it was sabotaged In Sebastian Stan Horror, “Fresh”. But the supermarket scene is not just a reference to the ROM-Com standard, but it is also a reference to Jeddah all the stories of the Dystopian Wife, “The Stepford Wives”. The 1975 cinematic adaptation from Bian Forbes of Era Levin’s novel for himself is not the first “men will really replace their wives with robots instead of going to treatment”, but it is undoubtedly the bond of every story of the horror of the Amnesty International partner that followed. Hell, the term “Stepford” is a common colloquial abbreviation used to describe characters like IRIS quickly.

“The Stepford Wives” is a horrific story for a city where Men replace their wives with a “perfect” robot copying This embraces the roles between the sexes in the fifties and play themselves freely to their husbands. The last scene of the film shows the amazing and perfectly smiling wives of the grocery grocery for the week and greet each other with the compliments of the gaming host. Where the audience learns that the protagonist Joanna (Catherine Ross) was unable to escape the transformation, and a bleak end wrapped in a good Iranian shirt dress and a large summer hat. The scene was also included in a new edition of the 2004 camp, starring Nicole Kidman.

Stepord wives were originally written to be spelling, but tragicly, this is exactly the world in which some men hope to be real.

The catalyst that was explored during these stories often falls under two categories – a need for control or desire to play God. Nathan Batman (Oscar Isaac) in “EX Machina”, for example, is a billionaire software engineer who chose to invest his money in mastery of girids so that he can replace women as colleagues and servants. He also got the “artificial intelligence” creativity “learning” data by stealing data from the search engine he created, which is A terrifying real possibility I will move directly before I have an existential crisis in the middle of the topic. Nathan is eventually destroyed by his arrogance, because he believes that the real mark on science is the ability to deceive people’s feelings of selfish goals. In essence, consciousness is the ability to control another person to submit.

I immediately remembered a line from the rape abbreviation movie “I Spit on Your Grave”, where one of the rapists says, “Total presentation. This is what I like about a woman. Permanent submission.” Rape is the most extreme forms of sexual violence, but it is rooted in controlling and stripping a person of its independence. According to the design, it is a prerequisite for Amnesty International’s friend to lack autonomy. When SPATIX Iris is delivered to Josh in “Companion”, the technician tells him that it will be completely easy and that he can do “everything he wants” for.

Moments after the establishment of a love link with it, the Lovebot version of your iPhone pair with Bluetooth in your car, has sex with it. When Iris finally learns the truth of her identity, she is even called “F *** Bot”, before she pleads with her that she is “much more” for that. Near the end of the film, a sympathy is a conversation with a conversation with his workshop on the number of times that people are tormented by their robots accompanying it for targeted practice or climbing them on the lower floors – violence is normalized, expected, expected, and something he says you “get used to “Because” children will be children “they were a little on the nose.

While many try to display the stories of AI’s girlfriends as a technical treatment to treat unit, the fact is that people who already use AI’s friend applications are the strength and control they can practice on women who cannot literally fight. Vanessa 5000 Performance Comedy from Courtney Bourouso As part of the leakage gifts It was a great examination, some of the relationship of society to women, sex, technological and intimate verification, the script by playing Sexbot slowly forced the audience at the expense of the fact that it will one day distinguish it from an actual human woman, and challenge their current compliance with the active topic.

To receive the Pauroso message is to see a good mind because it turns itself into a craftsman programmed to respond to the applause of the audience, searching for male health and obedience. “Perhaps, one day, Vanessas will be able to give humanitarian children allocated, or perhaps one day VANNESAS will be the state’s friends who are doubled as governmental drawings,” she says in AI-SQUE voice style. “Or maybe until one day, Vannesas will be military weapons as in the 1997 American movie,” Austin Powers “. Yes, my love. It refers to Fembots, of course, the beautiful Blonde Mod Blonde robots capable of seduction of their victims and shooting them with shot who shoots from their breasts.

It is a great joke, but if it is films like “Friend Deadly”, “EX Machina” and “Companion”, and yes, even “Austin Powers” must believe, the necessary step that follows the normalization of artificial intelligence girlfriends is the uprising Support with all the case.

Amok tales run by robots are not a new thing too, but the vast majority are stories about corruption Dystopian such as “The Terminator”, Ai Rogue Like “I, Robot” and “2001: A Space Odyssey” and “The Mitchells VS. Machinery,” or The technical version of “Women are crazy and clinging, right?” With “M3GAN”, “dependency”, and even The original Disney movie, “Smart House”. For the longest time, the stories of robots fight against human beings are depicted as the ultimate threat, and technology as something feared. Do not understand me wrong, we still have to be afraid of artificial intelligence, not because it is evil in nature, but because artificial intelligence will always be a reflection of what he learns from us.

when I met Franklin Rich, writer/director “The Artifice Girl” In 2023, he said what he believed would remain relevant is “exploring this idea that artificial intelligence will be a reflection of the best and worst parts of the people who create it”, which is exactly like the movie “Rafik” action. The writer/director Drew Hancock also told me to meet us, “If you live in a world where your phone seemed to be a human being, how will this affect not only how you are linked to the phone, but how is it related to humans (…) the line between the robot and the human being is not very clear, is it. Will you do everything?

Iris is not a dangerous robot because it is something essentially afraid, it is a dangerous robot because it has seen cruelty cruelty that human beings can unleash and learn how to put an end to it in any necessary means. I am associated with Iris because even as a human being, I was iris. I had partners from my independence, gas light, abuse of me, and controlling me because they felt that they were like “Alpha”. Watching IRIS gives a man like Josh exactly what it deserves is a kind of delicious wishes that most women will only receive in the most fantasies of our imaginations (for clear reasons).

Perhaps instead of learning Amnesty International from us, we can learn something or two accompanying robots such as Iris regarding how our freedom is restored from our persecution.