Companies find a possible way to avoid Trump’s tariff and maintain low prices

Donald Trump’s tariff system was He mocked the global business leaders and economists (Larry Samarz, for example, And invite her Both “crazy” and “stupid”), but the White House did not retract its very unconventional program. The definitions that impose taxes on American companies are said to be their imports Billionaire generation One of the dollars in federal government revenues on a monthly basis. However, many companies are not satisfied with it, and now many lawsuits threaten to compel the administration to pay most of the money collected by the Trump tariff program.

Two cases of the court sought to challenge the strange legal argument presented by the White House to justify the customs tariff program, Politico writes. This argument requires 1977 The Economic Forces Law for International EmergencyWhich was originally created to deal with the conditions of “extraordinary and unusual threat” for the nation, and ports ports I mentioned. Trump has It was previously martyred The crisis of fentanel and national deficit as abundant national emergency conditions that justify its administration to take unusual measures. The relevant law gives some powers that will not be available to the president, although the courts have committed whether what Trump does is qualified under the law.

Cases that challenge Trump’s policy were presented by a group of US importersAnd also 12 democratic countries That was considered Politico writes: Management actions are illegal. If the government’s tariff is considered illegal, the influential importers believe that they are entitled to recover, a commitment that the government recognized, the perpetrator says. He adds that these recovered sums will pass, and it is likely to be treated with customs and border protection. In short, if it is possible to go in the wrong way of Trump, this may mean that the government will have to pay many of the money it made through the definitions. This would actually be the entire revenue plot, which it seems It was partially developed to help pay the price of the main tax cuts It was passed in the beautiful, beautiful Trump bill. Politico notes that returning money to dark companies will also prove a “logistical nightmare”.

To date, the result does not look good for the White House either. Politico writes:

In May, a federal court sentenced Trump’s tariff that exceeded the authority of the president under the emergency law in 1977. This was followed by a narrower ruling from the Capital Provincial Court in a separate case that protects two small companies from the same definitions.

However, both decisions remained at a later time, while maintaining definitions in place as litigation works on its way through the federal court system. Most experts believe that it will eventually reach the Supreme Court.

“Two separate trials have already ruled against them, so the idea that this is certain is not standing.” “The possibilities of this against them are higher than 50-50.” Gizmodo continues the Trump administration to comment.

Not much data has not yet been collected about the widespread effect of Trump’s definitions on American companies, but it will be easy to assume that the effect was not good. Gossip online Among the small business owners, they showed an increasing warning in the new financial facts imposed on entrepreneurs through the increasing import duties, and in recent months, companies have attached them to them.Additional introductory fees“For customer receipts, in order to alert buyers to the fact that high prices are the result of the new program of the government, not meaningless prices. Some companies They thought about that They may have to close due to high costs, and legislative attempts have been made Exempt small companies From the government revenue scheme.

If the government is forced to pay all the money that it absorbed from American companies, it is clear that it will be a joyful defeat for the administration. The customs tariff system, as it seems to many, has been described by the White House as one of the president’s achievements. Trump has always described himself as the final deals maker, and the administration described the definitions as additional evidence of this. However, it should be noted that the deal is not worth much if it ends with illegal.