While Stephen King is loved globally when it comes to terror, his actual stories tend to be very specific. In fact, King reconsidering some of the topics and horror scenarios over and over, while clearly adhering to his personal interests as an author. Many have most likely noticed that King wrote multiple stories about alcoholic authors who are struggling to keep their lives together. This is logical when you read King’s personal tales of cocaine addiction, a problem that you deal with throughout the 1980s. Many king’s stories, from “The Body” To “it” To “Dreamcatcher”, he relies on his personal nostalgia in the fifties, and a group of Guy Con Satu-Conit friends who was suffering as a boy.
King often writes about the dangers of religious fanaticism and the brides of living with the personalities of the parents of offensive. It is often written about deadly cars or trucks, because it has a personal fear of vehicle accidents. Sometimes, though, King only praises the sudden caricature of its youth by just telling the monster tales of pleasure and bad guys. Sometimes, it appears to be only fun to torture some reassuring heroes by feeding them with a monster or a deadly man.
It is rare, though, that the king becomes raw like a Toby Hopper’s horror masterpiece in 1974. It is a movie that I adore, as he said in A recent interview with a variety. “The Texas Chain Saw Massacre” is not related to alcoholism, paradox or nostalgia; It is a dark story of meat, viscera, skin and bones. However, the stories of the king can be violent, as it brings a degree of elegance leading to his stories, drawing suburban homes, working class villages, or rural landscapes as emptiness -like places (the king rarely writes about weights). On the contrary, the “Texas Series massacre” is a neighborhood. There are times when it looks like a legitimate movie.
Stephen King terrified of the Vream massacre in Texas
Of course, saying that the “Texas series massacre” was afraid of a sufficient feeling. Toby Hopper in one way or another with a bleak mill movie throughout the ages, as he filmed the amazing and disgusting images to the point that it shines the world of cinema for several generations. The film was manufactured for only $ 140,000, but it ended up to nearly $ 31 million at the box office. Since then there have been eight follow -up filmsIncluding sequences, pre -resisting, and reshaping, making it a regular presence throughout popular culture.
So the king’s feelings may not be unique, but it honestly comes. He admitted that he was absent from the “Texas Series massacre” when it was first released in 1974, and he was not attached to it until 1982, when he was already famous and raised three children. King recalls his vision when he was alone in the theater, saying: “This is when the movie really tends to work on you, to get his cold cold fingers under your skin.” “A massacre,” he said, the amateurs seemed enough to feel like a real movie. After all, Hooper seems to be made by Cannibals that we are witnessing. The vision of ancient printing, only 35 mm, made it more terrifying. As the king said:
“This kind of washing appearance was in the seventies, because of the desire for the best period. You can say that this publication was present for a while, and it is better, because it only looks real. It works because it is nothing about. It’s great.”
A “massacre” is at the forefront of regularity Lists of the most terrifying movies in all ages. It is comfortable to hear that the horror master was completely afraid of Leatherface like us. The film is also discussed in the documentary of Alexandre O. Philippe, “Reactions Series”, about the effect of the film on some horror minds.
Source link
https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/the-classic-horror-movie-that-haunted-stephen-king/l-intro-1758239359.jpg