The Meta Supervisory Council is underwent new pressure to respond to the company’s recent policy changes to verify facts and moderation, which were made without inputs from the consulting group. A coalition of civil society organizations published an open letter to the Supervisory Council, saying that the group should resign collectively because “recent developments show that the company may abandon any pretext in supervision and not to consider the consequences.”
The message was first I mentioned by Washington PostIt comes from Global Coalition for Technical JusticeWhich consists of more than 250 human rights and digital advocates, fact -inspection organizations and other civil society groups from all over the world.
“The mass resignation will be a historical work of the conscience – it is not possible to exempt, ignore, ignore, ignore, ignore, hide or hide behind the curtains of the Supervision Council, which has no real power,” message He says. “By collecting collectively, it will appear in solidarity with all these societies affected by the unreasonable measures of Meta, increasing the general pressure on the definition and proving that real accountability cannot exist within a system designed to suppress it.”
Last month, Mark Zuckerberg announced that she is dead It will end Its long programs that define facts and decline in content baptisms that protect immigrants and LGBT members on their platform. Meta CEO, who said when establishing the Board of Directors, said that “Facebook should not make many important decisions about free and safety expression on our own,” It is said I decided to make changes after a visit with President -elect Donald Trump last year and only consulted a “handful” of people in Mita.
Chairman of the co -supervision council He later said These changes came as a “surprise” for the group, which was created to help form a policy at the level of the statute but was not consulted early in this case.
The Global Alliance for Technical Justice is not the first group that questions the role of the Supervision Council in the wake of the changes of the Zuckerberg’s comprehensive policy. Members of Congress It was also raised recently The problem is in a message addressed to the CEO of Meta. They wrote: “The Supervision Council, which is promoting a beacon of accountability, has become without teeth when Meta refuses itself to adhere to the principles of” trust and safety. “
One of the members of the Global Technical Justice Alliance was more direct. “If the Supervision Council has no role (even a consultant) in the largest individual change in moderate content since its foundation, it is clear that the experience has failed.” Critics of the Supervisory CouncilHe said in a statement last month.
Meanwhile, the Supervision Council has been kept in the response to dead changes so far. The group published statement Soon after Zuckerberg’s announcement, she said that she would “participate with the definition” in her plan to implement society’s observations. She later added a brief update that he said was “reviewing the effects of various changes” that go beyond “verification of facts.”
Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, the co -chair of the Supervisory Council said this "The Board of Directors evaluated Meta’s policy changes closely and investigated its influence" In its current cases. "As is always the case, we will make a strict and wise evaluation of these policies, issue binding decisions, and make the accurate policy recommendations to which Meta must respond – promote transparency for users and civil society on how these changes affect them."
Update, 13 February, 2025, 3:48 pm Labor Party: A statement from the Supervisory Council added.
This article was originally appeared on Engadget on https://www.engadget.com/social-Media/civil-sochety-groups-urge-tas-ovesight-board-to-resign-in-protest-2111349222.html ?Src= RSSRS = RSSRS = RSSRS.
[og_img]
Source link