California defeated the Kazinoes in the first referee on the Cardroom games

Photo of author

By [email protected]


California defeated the Kazinoes in the first referee on the Cardroom games

In California, the tribes run by the tribes ignore a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court judge in the Sacramento Province, Lori Dameril, who rejected a lawsuit against their non -tribal rooms.

the The ruling issued On August 8, it is centered on banking games like Blackjack and Baccararat.

The tribes argue that these games violate the rights of exclusive games under the state law.

Judge Laurie Dameril’s referee depended on the IGRA, which found the precedence over the tribal suit.

IGRA governs games on tribal lands, as in Kaoja won a nation over New York State over the lotteryBut the tribes, which is represented by lawyer Adam Loriden, argue that they are not relevant here because their complaints target the non -tribal cards that work out of caution.

Lorison, with the exception of IGRA, described the intimidation of the federal authority, as it shows that the Senate Law 549 (the law of tribal states has reached justice) gives tribes the right to prosecute cards rooms in state courts to impose their games rights.

He also warned that rejecting the case under IGRA leaves the tribes without a legal means to protect their rights and exclusivity.

Lorissin said: “(the verb) did not extend to this extent and it should not extend to this extent.”

“It cannot be obtained in both directions,” says Cardrooms.

On the contrary, lawyer David Horwich on behalf of the cards rooms argued that the tribes seek to eliminate competition by benefiting from all of the lawsuits in the IGRA court and the State Court.

This double approach was not open to use against tribes due to tribal sovereignty.

“They cannot get it in both directions,” Horwich confirmed.

“For this reason (organizational action) exists.”

According to the Senate Bell 549, the tribes have the right to challenge the cards rooms in the court on banking games, where a “house” or a third party works as a bank.

Cardrooms opposes this because it maintains its use of third -party players (TPPS) for bank games that is compatible with the state law, despite tribal allegations that it is an illegal solution to provide gaming games at home.

Tribal claim is that the use of Cardrooms for TPPS violates their exclusive rights, which costs them significant revenues with more direct effects on society.

Another session scheduled for October 10 will be determined whether Judge Dameril is revising her ruling on the lawsuit, which was first presented at the beginning of this year, which included more than 90 defendants, including Cardrooms and TPPS.

Credit image: California.com

Pamphlet California defeated the Kazinoes in the first referee on the Cardroom games First appear on reading.



[og_img]

Source link

Leave a Comment