In what is called humanity for a week or a rescue to save the Palestinians from starvation, the moment of Donald Trump “I See It” may be a turning point.
Humanitarian organizations have warned for several months that Israel’s restrictions on the flow of aid were bringing Gaza to the brink of starvation. Another warning from the non -subsidized hunger screen said on Tuesday that the famine is now unveiled through the pocket.
However, at the end of last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “There is no hunger in Gaza.” Hamas is accused of stealing available aid.
Trump seemed to be indifferent until Monday when he was in Scotland, he publicly opposed with Netanyahu, saying he saw pictures of children who were starving.
“This is the real hunger,” he said.
“I see it – and you cannot be fake.”
With the conflict in Gaza in stalemate – and the civilian population who pay a more slope price, including the Israeli hostages who are still in the hands of Hamas – what Israeli allies, especially Trump is doing, is the key to putting bloodshed to some extent.
The growing call choir last week, which was shipped from the Group of Seven countries, including Canada, to Israel to open the crossings in Gaza, has already began to change on the ground.
Israel, which insisted on its controversial controversial means, forced at least to resume air drops and reduce the movement of aid trucks to Gaza. It also stopped fighting in three areas daily to allow aid to flow.
Trump’s public recognition gave urges those calls that can only come from Israeli ally, which can help Netanyahu make more effort to alleviate the Gaza humanitarian crisis.
Within hours, Netanyahu’s office issued a statement that Israel will continue to work with international agencies and other countries to “ensure large flows of aid” to Gaza.
More settlement of the West Bank
How Trump plans to persuade Netanyahu to follow up on what the president described as a “different way” to bring 50 Israeli hostages in Gaza will be more difficult.
Trump was keen to conclude a deal that would see all the hostages that were issued, and the Israeli attacks on Gaza ended. But the United States and Israel withdrew their teams from the last talks in Rome, accusing Hamas of negotiating bad faith.
Israel’s attacks on the Gaza Strip sent the region to a hunger crisis, and now the non -supported food crisis authority says that the situation reaches the levels of starvation. According to integrated food security classification platform, two out of three doorstep in Gaza have been reached: low food consumption and acute malnutrition.
Those familiar with the talks point to one of the biggest obstacles to a permanent ceasefire is that Hamas wants one permanent, while Israel refuses to leave Gaza with Hamas is still responsible.
The other is Netanyahu’s opposition to a two -state solution. The settlements in the West Bank were doubled under the leadership of Netanyahu, and in an undisputed vote in the Israeli Knesset last week, the majority of the West Bank was completely supported.
This is why the closest Western allies in Israel recently confirmed their support for a two-state solution-which is also the cornerstone of the long time in the policy of the central East in Canada-promising to recognize a Palestinian state this fall.
France announced last week that it intends to recognize such a state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Under pressure from within his government, UK Prime Minister Kiir Starmer also said on Tuesday that he would get to know a Palestinian state in September-what Israel did not agree to the ceasefire, and take steps to clarify that there is no “annex to the West Bank, and is committed to a long-term peace process that provides a solution.”
The United States is far from doing the same. But if the other Western allies, and perhaps even Canada, join the choir (147 other countries that already recognize the Palestinian state), Trump may have to recognize at least the transformation.
A spokesman for the Global Affairs Canada said that they were “familiar with” the UK decision and repeated a previously announced position that Canada “is ready to get to know a Palestinian state at the time most preferred to permanent peace, and not necessarily as a last step along the way to achieve a two -state solution.”
Netanyahu condemned the declaration of France and is likely to receive the British decision similarly, on the pretext that they were “rewarding terrorism”, following the killing of Hamas for about 1,200 people on October 7, 2023, and kidnapped 250 others.
But Britain has anticipated such accusations and once again called Hamas to release the 50 hostages.
“Hamas is not the Palestinian people, and there is no contradiction between supporting Israel’s security and support for the Palestinian state,” said British Foreign Secretary David Lami.
Possible penalties
However, some critics are skeptical that such ads will do anything to move the needle useful to resolving the immediate or larger conflict.
Michael Link, a former special feet in the field of human rights in the Palestinian territories, said that such gestures “will not make any permanent change of Israeli behavior.”
“Countries in the global north will have to take an important step forward by looking at sanctions against Israel in order to make any permanent progress in achieving a Palestinian state.”
France, Canada and the United Kingdom signed a joint statement in May, and promised not to “stand by the Netanyahu government these terrible measures.
“If Israel does not stop the renewed military attack and raise its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take more concrete actions in response.”
What these procedures are not clarified, but Link says it can include penalties.
“Only the sanctions regarding military sales and economic relations with Israel are likely to have any opportunity to change Israel’s behavior,” he said.
Trump did not immediately comment on the British decision, but last week, it reduced the statement of Emmanuel Macron.
“What he says does not matter,” he said. “It will not change anything.”
How all this plays now after Starmer added his voice may be largely dependent on how to see Trump.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7596555.1753813354!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/aptopix-trump-scotland.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link