Biden became a scapegoat for the Democrats

Open the newsletter to watch the White House for free

Your guide to what the second period of Trump means to Washington, business and the world

original sin It is a strange name for book It turns out that this is evident from 2023 to 2024. This means that readers will be transferred to the final root of the problem – the problem is that Donald Trump is in the White House – while the authors lead them along the blame trail over more than two years. It was when the old Joe Biden decided to run for the presidency again. It was a heinous decision. The cover -up was worse. Their peers who did not contact him must go to offer a televised discussion last summer to be reflected in their competence.

But this was not the “origin” of anything. Biden has become a scapegoat for a long -term democratic problem, and it is tolerance of the losers in potential and installed elections often.

If there was a sin, a fall, the Democrats of Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate in 2016. The history of the world has turned into this single act of appearing. Opinion polls told the party that voters hated it. She had already lost great progress to young Barack Obama in the primaries eight years ago. It is true that her low reputation was not fair. It is not more impossible or hypocritical than other politicians, and it is just one of the factors of life in life. But the world is what it is. Democrats chose to ignore the objective truth of its inception, and the result is the Trump era, which may have been possible to avoid.

The other event that led us to what we are today was the height of Kamala Harris as Rafik Biden in 2020. Given his time, all Democrats were giving president in the future. Again, they were spoiled for evidence about its borders. She was the first note to withdraw from the introductory elections. Among those who were superior to the mayor of Indiana, the fourth largest city in Indiana.

Biden holds the nominal blame for her choice as a colleague in running, but “choice” is a misleading word here. There was an implicit democratic rule that the white man could not run with another white man. So not the Buttigieg House. Senator Minnesota Amy Klopochar was a strong performance but also took place in the history and modern policy of the country in which George Floyd, who all excluded it. Is there another party that connects itself in such?

In general, Biden’s refusal in time is third in the list of democratic foolishness over the past decade. The problem is not one man. The problem is a group illusion style about the candidates back to the previous century. Look at the margins of defeat. It has not been since Barry Goldutut Republican, who were offended the injury of the candidate and voters, just as well as the Democrats did with George McGaven, Walter Mondeel and Michael Dukakis.

In the nation of 50-50 today, Democrats are always able to compete. As a result, it is easy to miss the amazing distress of their candidates. Tim Walz was the first person in the upper or lower half of a democratic presidential ticket since 1980 who did not go to the Law College. There has been no southerner at the summit since the Al -Gore family at the beginning of the millennium, although the lack of confidence that the Democrats should overcome there. Last November, in a competition he truly described as an existential constitution, the party put a pair of California (who has not voted Republican since the 1980s) and Minnesota (which did not vote Republic in the 1980s). This is always ready to meet the swinging voters who are swinging on the tenth.

To be bad in choosing a leader is to be bad in politics. All that seems important in that trade, such as ideas and tactics, it flows from the software individual at the end. Good leaders will tend to get these things properly. Like Harris, Ed Miliband or Jeremy Corpin in the UK, they will not reliably do it. If this logic looks circular – “winning winning” – I am afraid that this policy will be. There must be more research and comments on what constitutes “IT”, known as the X worker, more than campaigns, data, and others Outputs From politics, a study that you exercise through a telescope from the wrong end.

The question is why Democrats in particular make a mistake in choosing leadership. The parties may be more softened on human weakness. The motive that leads them to protect people without profitable skills from the market forces (something good) is the motive that makes them construct from electoral summaries (something bad). This would explain the reason for the presence of the UK Labor Party often the same problem: for all Dokakis, Kenoc.

Or it may be that the progressive, trained to think in terms of structural powers, consider a focus on individual, irrational talent. Increasingly, Democrat is a person who wore Trump’s rise on academic – neoliberals, and oligarchy – but he wanders in wet work because the turkey agreed on a candidate every four years.

Either way, this problem is preceded by Biden years. Even if he resigned earlier, Democrats at all possibilities still have chosen Harris out of respect to seniority and agreed unidentified. With a longer campaign, thus showing more than the construction of the unusual ambiguity and beliefs, I think it would have been doing the worst of what it did against Trump. original sin Senior Democrats are presented as a people of self -compassion. One of the foreigners says: “We felt very distress from Biden as a party,” says one of the foreigners. “We felt annoyed by the party as a scientist,” one reader.

[email protected]