Best VPN for Japan: Enhancing your privacy and canceling the ban on global broadcast content

ipvanish

ipvanish It is a simple -use VPN with wonderful broadcast speeds and a decent safety wing. (IPvanish owned by the mother company itself as CNET, ZifF Davis. Unfortunately, it is not the best VPN for Japan due to its uneven speeds. The speed test results were everywhere, making it difficult to flow or use the Internet. In addition, the fast connection button sometimes did not do what has been announced. Although we only experienced this in the United States, given the different speed results outside the country, I do not recommend his experience in Japan.

Read the iPvanish review.

Access to private internet (PIA)

Bia VPN is a friend of the wallet cheaper than most competitors at $ 12 per month, and $ 40 for the first year (renewal of $ 50 annually) or a total of $ 79 for three years of service. Despite all you offer, we do not recommend using it in Japan due to the Japanese server network limited (only servers in Tokyo) and high internet speed. PIA also provides unlimited unlimited connections, a benefit that does not have a probably VPNS like Proton, Expressvpn and NordVPN. It is suitable for canceling a broadcasting service, provides a powerful network of 35,000 servers in 91 countries, and it can be largely customized, albeit a little unpleasant. People who live in the United States or often travel PIA servers in all of the fifty United States – this can be helpful to broadcast regional sports, such as American Football Association games.

We love its open source applications, which means that anyone can examine the source code for errors or weaknesses, which is solid transparency. Only a few of the other service providers, including VPN Proton and Mullvad, have open source applications. Although PIA is largely sticking to covering the basics, it is characterized by some privacy amenities, including the MacOS tunnel (which allows you to use VPN for some applications and services but not others) – rare among VPN providers. It is worth noting that Surfshark also has a division MAC tunnel.

Unfortunately, Pia was rough around the edges on the last test round. We recorded a 49 % overwhelming internet speed loss, 25 % higher than we would like to see. In addition, we faced many Captchas while trying to perform basic tasks such as Google Search. Although the flow was very appropriate, we had to change the servers more than other service providers, such as NordVPN, Proton VPN, Expressvpn or Surfshark. You can get Surfshark, which provides much faster speeds, a better experience for broadcasting and more thinking features forward, for more money. However, PIA can be good in the budget of people who need a comprehensive coverage of the American server. Otherwise, your money is likely to spend better on Surfshark or Proton VPN, both of which provide faster server performance and strong privacy with a little more money charged.

Read our PIA review.