BBC threatens to prosecute confusion, claims “literally” reproduction for her content

the BBC threatens to prosecute the search engine from confused intelligence For unauthorized use of its content, you claim artificial intelligence The company generates BBC “literally”.

In a letter to the CEO of Perplexity Aravind Srinivas, as published by Financial times On Friday, the BBC claims that the artificial intelligence model “has been trained using the BBC content.” The British Broadcasting Corporation said it would seek a judicial order unless the confusion stops stripping the BBC content, deleting all BBC materials and submitted a “suggestion for financial compensation”.

The British Broadcasting Corporation refused to comment, but said that the report was accurate.

In a statement of FT, Al -Hirah said that the BBC claims “manipulation and opportunism” and that the broadcast giant does not mainly understand how technology, Internet or intellectual property law works. Al -Hujir also claimed that the threat of litigation indicates “the extent of the BBC’s willingness to go to keep Google’s illegal monopoly for its own benefit.”

An American judge spent this year this year Google violated the Anti -Monopathic Law To enhance research dominance.

since Confusion is an online search engine Built above a Language modelIt can greatly answer any question that is asked. This means that it needs high -quality information to give users satisfactory answers. BBC claims that as confusion generates answers based on the BBC content, this reduces the need for readers to go to the BBC directly.

There is also concern that artificial intelligence companies do not use their journalist properly and fairly, which may harm their reputation. The BBC claims 17 % of the confusion research responses had major issues, and “the most common problems were realistic inaccuracy, sources and missing in the missing.”

The confusion did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Although this is the first time that the BBC has followed after the artificial intelligence company, it is not the first time that confusion has had problems with publishers. The outlets that currently sue or threaten to prosecute confusion due to the violation of copyright Wall Street Magazine Along with the New York Post, Forbes and New York Times. Before Wireless Last year, confusion had found ways to overcome the blocs and scrape its content.

In the midst of these complaints, Al -Hirah launched the revenue sharing program with publishers Last year, which includes Fortune, Time, Texas Tribute and Der Spiegel.

Publishers have become a great defensive for their content, as artificial intelligence companies see reviews against the background of the narrow margins in the media. Openai, Creator ChatgptCurrently, he has a rating of $ 300 billion and The evaluation of confusion increased to 14 billion dollars. Confusion Investors Softbank, Nvidia, Amazon and Washington Post include Jeff Bezos. This is while the press has struggled in the era of the Internet, with The declaration of dollars is made By Google and turning attention towards Social media applications. Since 2005, 2,900 local journalists have been closed in the United States, according to a study Northwestern University.

(Disclosure: Zif Davis, the parent company CNET, filed a lawsuit against Openai, claimed that it had violated the copyright of ZifF Davis in training and operating artificial intelligence systems.)