There are two aspects of this currency: First, the general behavior to consider positively in the author/publisher’s efforts, and thus promoting their interests-which you do not need, although it does not need unbalanced protection and a self-club atmosphere. Secondly, it is important here, somewhat lightly illuminates the light on those who made the types of real errors and other errors.
In the very light category I Human, References on this site tend to ignore Realistic errorsWith the exception of books that claim to be a history, with the associated inclusion as accurate. For example, with Mihir Bose The Nine Waves (2019), there were mistakes that he should not reach the publication stage:
“There are some things that spoil Nine waves. The first is not to pay attention to the details, either in reality verification or editing or both. The author’s mistakes can be seen as, sometimes sometimes, by references. But in the case of books that aim to be a history, confidence in the mentioned facts assumes greater importance, especially if it is possible to avoid errors easily. “
Then he notes eight errors, which is very specific to it. For example:
-
- “A photo of the Tindolkar in The OVAL in 2011 is described as seeking to register a hundred century instead of its hundred -hundred centuries.”
- “Yajurvindra Singh should be from Bika from Bilka.”
By conducting a review of Ian Lukwood’s book on the life and times of Ted Peter (published in May this year), he indicates that there is:
“… two of the mistakes that should have been taken in the proof reading phase …”
Although it does not explain their nature or in the book that occurs.
Housmann is cute here as a review of David Frayth for this book in Cricket player The magazine refers to more than just errors.
elsewhere:
“…In fact, they are not a kind of mistakes that cause the reader to question the general content of this book. “
It rarely draws attention to Typical errors and grammatical errors Which may decrease a little but do not detract from the total product.
Examples include Bart King’s biography of Stephen Mosk and Roger Man (2022): “
That was treated as harmless and let us pass.
With self -flyers, Housmann usually prefers not to mention typographical errors and grammatical errors at all:
“Those who spread self -suffer from my blessing, and my expectations of them reduce my appreciation for the challenges they face.”
One exception to this situation is the mistakes that were observed in the Story of the Scottish Dxter by Andy B (2020):
“By the definition, the self -publishers do not have editors, but it is a shame that a number of spelling errors cannot be captured. Likewise, there are some corridors in which the rules go slightly, and there is no actually on the occasions that tend to have something that tends to have something that tends to be something that tends to tend to have something that tends to have something that tends to run a little.”
Finally, I think for a short time George allows l Also references on this site. It does not really go to sign errors of any kind. This may be outside the principle, laziness, or perhaps a lack of knowledge. It is also reasonable that he simply failed to discover anything, or that no one in the relatively few works he reviewed.
Official classification
We can now move to a formal classification of reference patterns regarding specified errors. This ranges from a completely transparent approach at one end of the spectrum, and passes through transparent to completely transparent at the other end. The approved hierarchical numbering system is an adaptation to the famous Austrian philosopher, Ludwig Wittgenstein in his book Treaty (It was initially published in German in 1921). Categories related to “serious” mistakes indicate that the error distorts the meaning of what is said and is subject to misinformation of the reader.
Completely
- Not Of any errors or real or realistic errors, regardless of the number of appearances or the danger.
- Remember number Among the typographical errors, grammatical and realistic errors occur.
- Also mentioned where Errors occur.
3.1 Mention where In the text, each of the serious realistic errors appears.
3.2 In addition, mention where In the text, each of the non -malicious realistic errors appears.
3.3 In addition, mention where In the text, each of the typos and grammatical errors appears.
4. Also save Corrections.
4.1 savings Correction versions For each of the serious realistic errors.
4.2 In addition, saving Correction versions Each of the non -malicious real errors.
4.3 In addition, saving Correction versions Each of the typographical errors and grammatical errors.
Completely transparent
The non -participating observer may think that all readers of the Cricket Books reviews, or almost all of them, have immediately filled with the final category that is revealed. But one should not jump to conclusions, as this will be the anticipation of the purpose of this exercise.
There are reasons to think that a reasonable percentage of readers may prefer, for example, that they prefer books on the books of defining themselves in category 2, and giving the book concerned with loss in the event of a large number of realistic errors; Or maybe a preference for category 3.1 if it is familiar, so with corrections in mind; Or go another way for the 4.1 category.
Dear reader, I hope you think about the eight options mentioned above and indicate your own preferences, using the comments box below. After two and a half weeks, we will increase registration for each option and teach you how the results should be reviewed the future books on this site.