Apple says that DOJ monopoly claim will lead to “reducing consumer choice”

Apple provided its official response to A lawsuit against monopoly the The Ministry of Justice was raised against it Last year, who accused the company of monopolizing smartphones and criticized its “wall garden” approach at work. He said that the lawsuit threatens what distinguishes iPhone in a competitive market, reduces the choice of the consumer, as well as the erosion of competition. In addition, Apple warned that it might put a “dangerous precedent” in allowing the government “to pick up a heavy hand in the design of people’s technology.”

In his file, as I shared it 9to5macApple responded to every point made by the agency in its complaint. The Ministry of Justice said that “Apple suffocates the success of” super applications “or applications that provide multiple services on one platform, but the company’s file said that” its rules allow and support such applications. “The company added that many of them are available in the application store today. Apple also denied the administration’s claim that it prevents cloud broadcast games and said that it allows broadcasting the game via the web and in the application store.

The company also said that the Ministry of Justice’s claim that it degrades the applications of the third -party messaging is incorrect, as the company said, and it is widely available on iPhone. Apple denied that she limits third -party smart watches and said it could “can be effectively associated with iPhone”, as well as “sharing data to and from iPhone via accompanying application.” The other claim was that Apple blocks access to the iPhone devices necessary for a third -party digital portfolio to be able to use tap technology to pay. The company said it “has evolved and provides a mechanism that protects the user’s safety with the enabled third -party developers to provide alternative payment applications.”

The company wrote in its file: “Apple is simply not monopolized,” the company wrote in its file. She said that the Ministry of Justice measures its share in the smart phone market through revenue instead of sales of units. It also puts smartphones and “smartphone performance” in separate categories, which “do not correspond to economic reality.” Apple has accused the Ministry of Justice of the tight focus on Apple “without somewhat looking at the main manufacturers such as Samsung and Google that (the company) in which it is built in the United States, not to mention the various low-cost-cost manufacturers-especially from China-face Apple worldwide.”

like 9to5mac Notes, the lawsuit is now heading to the stage of discovery, as both sides will now have to collect evidence to support their case.