Apple Holding emergency files to challenge the application store

An apple for her The emergency movement raisedThe Federal Appeal Court demands a stoppage of orders that will significantly change how the application store works. These changes, as the company argued in its proposal, will cost the company "Large sums annually" It is based on the behavior that was not "It is judged to be (and not) illegal." She said that these orders were punished by Apple "The alleged compliance" To previous requests.

If you are going to remember, Judge IPhone Gonzales Rogers recently spent I violated Apple Its ruling in 2021 on the routeing epic games against Apple. In its original decision, the judge told the company to allow developers to direct users to other payment systems that would allow them to exceed the 30 percent commission fees that Apple collects. But Apple still collects up to 27 percent of external purchases, as users have shown "Scratching screen" Warning that payment outside the application store means that they will not enjoy the company’s protection.

In its new ruling, Gonzalez Rogers ordered the stop to collect fees for external payments immediately. Apple also prevented the creation of rules that would prevent developers from providing customers with buttons and links to external payments. apple She changed her guidance To remove the ban on the buttons and external links that direct customers to non -store purchase mechanisms. However, Gonzales Rogers’s decision has appealed and is now asking the court to establish residence on these two appointed systems during its appeal.

Apple insisted on its proposal that it is illegal to prevent the company from taking the related transactions, because the original decision did not say anything about commissions or pricing. He also argued that it is illegal to prevent the company from identifying the conditions for the status of the link and the language because the original irregular matter did not say anything about it. Apple said that this ruling violates the first amendment, by forcing it to do so "In accommodate the messages that are preferred to be excluded." The company accused the court of punishing it because, in his opinion, Apple "The court’s order erupted."

"Without staying, these extraordinary interventions in Apple will lead to an irreparable damage. The deprivation of Apple of controlling the basic features of the application store stands alone, which is enough to justify the residence," The company wrote. "The District Court acknowledged that compliance will cost Apple “hundreds of millions to billions of dollars” annually … which Apple can never recover. Consumers will suffer from the destructive effects of the new podium, while the epic will not be affected by the residence."

Epic games called Apple "The last Ditch effort to prevent competition and extract unwanted fees at the expense of consumers and developers." In addition to the video game developer, other companies are also keen to provide external payments that would allow them to bypass the Apple Committee. Spotify presented, to one of them, already an update that would allow users to pay outside the application store to customers in the United States.

When Gonzalez Rogers issued her decision, she revealed that the leadership of the Phil Schilller App Store called for stopping the collection of fees on web links again in 2023. However, former financial manager Luka Maystrem Cook persuaded to do the opposite. She said that the Vice President of the Finance Company, Alex Roman, lied under the department and told the court that Apple did not decide to collect fees of 27 percent on external purchases until early 2024, while the fact is that Apple had already decided in this possible percentage in 2023.

This article was originally appeared on Engadget on https://www.engadget.com/big-tech



[og_img]

Source link