AOC opposes the decision of the House of Representatives to honor Charlie Kirk after the assassination

representative. Alexandria Okasio CortezOn Friday, DN.Y opposed a decision to honor the life and founder of Turning Point Usa Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated on September 10 during a participation in the Utah Valley University.

In a letter in the house hall, OCASIO-Cortez claimed that the decision was submitted on the basis of a “purely party, instead of uniting Congress.”

After condemning the Kirk killing, she indicated that the decision “brings great pain to millions of Americans who endured the chapter, Jim Crowe, and the legacy of intolerance today”, and a 31 -year -old ideology.

“We must be clear about who Charlie Kerk It was: A man believed that the civil rights law that granted black Americans, the right to vote was wrong, which, after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi, claimed that “some amazing patriots” should save his brutal striker, and accused the Jews of controlling colleges “not only from others,” he is from other organizations, he is from others, “. The beliefs were ignorant and incredible and sought to deprive millions – Away from “working tirelessly to enhance unity,” as the majority confirmed in this decision.

58 Democrats House voted against the decision to honor “life and legacy” by Charlie Kerk

The decision described Kirk as a “loyal Christian”, a “dedicated husband”, and a “love father” for two children, explaining his founding of the Turning Point Usa program and praises his embodiment in the first amendment.

The House of Representatives has been condemned by Kirk’s assassination and all forms of political violence; I praise the law enforcement to capture the alleged Kirk killer; Extending condolences to the Kirk family; Honoring Kerk’s life, leadership and heritage; And calling on all Americans – who do not obtain race, party affiliation, or belief – to “reject political violence, contact respectful discussion, support American values, and respect each other as American colleagues.”

The “Fear” tour takes the task of freedom of expression in Charlie Kerk to colleges worldwide

In addition to OCASIO-Cortez, 57 other Democrats voted against decision, including Ilhan Omar from Minnesota, rightly guided Michigan and Maxine California water.

However, 95 democratic decision to adopt the decision, including Minority Hakeem Jeffries, DN.Y. Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass. Boucus Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.

Here are the details of Kerk’s general comments regarding the topics mentioned by OCASIO-Cortez in its opposition.

AOC’s claim: Charlie Kirk was a man who believed the Civil Rights Law that gave black Americans that the right to vote was a “mistake”

During February 2, 2024, the podcast episode with the “Fearless” host, Jason Whitke, acknowledged his ideas surrounding the Civil Rights Law and its role in the current American society “provocative”, thanks and Becky for the opportunity to clarify this.

“It is a terrible provocative conversation that I started with, and I stand by her, and I appreciate this opportunity – I mean this sincerely, Jason – to explain that. Some people on the right who were just insults, and they will never be in the exhibition to explain that.”

Kirk went on to say that he discussed a large scale in the Civil Rights Law, what he tried to accomplish, how it was sold to the American people at that time, and how it is now seen by the modern academic consensus.

“At that time, of course, there were legislative priorities that the federal government must stop to stop the bitter semester – I have always seen it,” Kirk said. “The American people believed that they were obtaining minor legislative adjustments to say that the chapter-based chapter is evil and wrong. In fact, what they got was the birth of a permanent bureaucrats of bureaucrats who were looking for racism as it was not in reality with positive work, shares and employment practices expanding sweat in LGBTQ problems.

“The right to civil rights has been born that this is the task of the federal government not only to say that discrimination is wrong, but on any kind of different results, and trying to even the result under the guise of stocks.”

Trump’s fighting sounds refer to Charlie Kerk’s legacy after the assassination, he says he was doing the policy “The right path”

Kirk continued to discuss Martin Luther King Junior’s speech, “I had a dream, saying that” it was purchased 100 % “the need for equality, adding that he believed that the Civil Rights Law has been expanded more than the initial intention.

“At that time, most Americans wanted to see the end of the chapter,” he said. “They did not want to see a new chapter that was put in the ultimate employment practices in combating eggs, positive work, or the entire federal bureaucracy that has racist employment classes.

“In the end, you look around, and you have a black reference that defends hundreds of universities throughout the country, and only black graduation parties … You are looking at the Civil Rights Law and you say may have passed and made something that we do not intend, and it is federal federal in the form of hostility to racism.”

Watch: Click here to watch the full podcast episode

AOC’s claim: After Paul Pelosi’s violent attack, Charlie Kirk claimed that “some amazing national” should save the brutal striker

On October 31, 2022, an episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show”, entitled “A Nude Steel from Maga”, Kerk 28, October 28, 2022, discussed the attack against Nancy Pelosi The husband, directly, said, “I do not qualify it, I think it is terrible.”

David Deepyeb, a Canadian citizen living in the United States, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2024 after he attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer, causing head wounds and injuries to his right arm and hand.

Depape, who Kirk described in the episode as a “not sane” person, admitted a plot to hold the Speaker of the then Democratic Parliament, Nancy Pelosi, as a hostage and “break her knee” if she did not recognize the claim of “lying” about the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. She was not at home at the time of the attack.

KIRK’s comments on “Depape” regarding the concept of contrast were within the non -cash sponsorship policies.

Under the non -cash sponsorship policies, the suspect who has been arrested regarding the perpetration of a crime is released before being tried without the need to pay the guarantee or bonds. The fees were placed in place to ensure that the suspects do not escape, and to motivate them to the back of the scheduled court.

While many liberal judicial states have enacted these policies, critics claim that non -cash guarantee endangered the public and enables the perpetrators to be repeated.

“I am not eligible (the attack), I think it is terrible,” Kirk said. “This is not true. But why, in Chicago, you are able to commit a murder and be out the next day. Why are you able to infringe on the property of others, second -class killing, burn operations, threaten a general employee, (and I got) with a non -cash guarantee.

Charlie Kerk drew it “controversial”, “provocative” in covering the assassination of the media

Kirk continued to ask about the reason for the Depape prison in San Francisco, a democratic stronghold with a non -cash sponsorship policies in force at the time of Paul Pelosi’s attack.

Just a few months before the attack, the San Francisco Brooke Jenkins County Lawyer announced that her office had developed a policy that would seek a cash guarantee in some misdemeanor cases, claiming the guarantee, “to punish those who suffer from less financial means and impatiently affect the accused of colors.”

“Why is the conservative movement to blame the gay, naked with schizophrenia who are cannabis jewelry makers, storming a person’s house …”. “Why do we blame this exactly, and why is he still in prison. Why is it not saved? By the way, if there are some amazing patriots there in San Francisco or the Gulf region who wants to be an average hero, someone must go out and blow this man.

Watch: Click here to watch the full episode

Kirk continued to wish Paul Pelosi a rapid recovery, and condemned the attack for the second time.

“See, I wish him the best. I wish him a quick recovery,” Kirk said. “No one should face this type of violence.”

AOC’s claim: Charlie Kerk accused the Jews of controlling colleges only – they are non -profit organizations, they are films, they are Hollywood, all of this. “

On October 26, 2024 “The Charlie Kirk Show” PodCast, Kerk claimed that Jewish donors were the 1st financing mechanism of extremist Marxist policies, cultural and non -profit institutions.

“This is a monster created by secular Jews,” Kirk said. “Now it comes to the Jews, and they are like,” what happened on the ground. “It is not only colleges.

Kirk, a long -standing supporter of Israel, later argued on November 16, 2023, the episode “The Charlie Kirk Show”, Eileon Musk helped in the digital narration “that some Jewish organizations and donors, including the Anti -Defamation Association (ADL), helped fund” anti -white “or” cultural Marxist “ideas that are in line with the movement of blacks or diversity and the inclusion of stocks (Dei).

Click here to get the Fox News app

He pointed out that he does not believe that all the Jewish people are hostile to the environment-which determines that he “does not like generalizations.”

“I don’t like the generalizations,” Kirk said in the episode. “Not every Jewish person thinks that. But it is correct that the Anti -Distort Association was an integral part of black life. It is managed for colleges.”

Kirk added that after the October episode, critics described him as anti -Semitism, explaining that he was “happy because the Jewish Americans are reconsideration of their financing of cultural Marxism, and the misunderstanding of people intentionally and our country as hostile to the lines.”

While “Cultural Marxism” was used as a anti -Semitic phrase, it was known that commentators used it without anti -Semitic intention.