Anger builds on a plan to force all gas on the southern city

For Gazan, the 60 -day ceasefire is negotiated between Israel and Hamas will be the lifeline.

A window to bring large quantities of food, water and medicine that affects the need after severe Israeli restrictions – and sometimes – Israeli on delivery operations.

However, for the Israeli Minister of Defense, Israel Katz has a two -month stand in military operations that will create an opportunity to build what he called a “human city” in the ruins of the southern city of Rafah to contain almost every Ghazan with the exception of those who belong to armed groups.

According to the plan, Palestinian security will be examined before they are allowed to enter and are not allowed to leave.

Critics, at the local and international levels, condemned the proposal, with human rights groups, academics and lawyers who call it a plan for the “concentration camp”.

It is not clear to what extent is a concrete plan for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government or whether it is a negotiating tactic to increase the pressure on Hamas in the talks on the shooting and betting deal.

In the remarkable absence of any Israeli plan for Gaza after the end of the war, this idea fills the strategic void.

Katz has briefed a group of Israeli correspondents that the new camp will initially host about 600,000 Palestinians – and eventually 2.1 million people.

His plan will witness that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) secures the site from a distance while international bodies run the region. He said that four aid distribution sites will be created in the area.

Katz also returned his desire to encourage the Palestinians to “voluntarily migrate” from Gaza to other countries.

But she did not gain traction or support from among other senior figures in Israel, and according to reports, the proposal sparked a clash between the Prime Minister and the head of the Israeli Defense Army.

The Israeli media says that the Office of the Chief of the General Staff, Litanant General Eyal Zamir, made it clear that the army was not obligated to transport civilians by force, as required.

He claimed that General Zamir and Netanyahu participated in an angry exchange during the last cabinet meeting.

Tal Schneider, a political correspondent in the Middle Ages in Israel, said that Zamir would be in a strong position to retreat because the government “has practically begged to take office” six months ago – Netanyahu strongly supported his appointment.

Not only is the military military that opposes the idea. There is also panic between the rank and the file as well.

“Any transfer to civilian residents is a form of war crime, and this is a form of ethnic cleansing, and it is also a form of genocide,” said Yutam Welk, who is considered the BBC at his home in Tel Aviv.

The 28 -year -old former officer in the armored Legion refuses to serve anymore in the army after 270 days of active fighting in Gaza.

He describes himself as a patriot and says that Israel must defend itself, but the current war has no strategy and endless on the horizon.

Vilk is also part of the soldiers of the hostages, a group calling for the end of the war to secure the launch of the fifty Israelis who are still being held by Hamas in Gaza, and it is believed that up to 20 of them alive.

Meanwhile, 16 Israeli experts in international law issued a joint speech on Friday calling on the plan, which they said would constitute a war crime. The letter urged “all the relevant parties to publicly withdraw from the plan, abandon it and refrain from carrying it.”

The plan was terrified of the Palestinians in Gaza.

“We reject this proposal completely, and we reject any Palestinian displacement from his land,” Sabreen, who was forced to leave Khan Yunis, told the BBC. “We are steadfast and we will remain here until our last breath.”

Ahmed Al -Maghayar from Rafah said: “Freedom is above everything. This is our land, we must be free to move to any place we want. Why are we under pressure like this?”

It is not clear how much support provided by the Katz plan between the public public, but recent investigative studies indicated that the majority of Jews in Israel prefer to expel the Palestinians from Gaza.

One poll, published in the left day, called for up to 82 percent of the Jewish Israelis such a move.

But there was a strange shortage of general support for the proposal between the extreme right, including prominent ministers in the ITAMAR BEN-GVIR and Bezalel Smotrich.

Both were supporters of the Palestinians who leave Gaza and the Jewish settlers.

Tal Schneider said that both ministers may still be weighing their support for a proposal to obtain a collective camp.

“Maybe they are waiting to find out where the wind is blowing to see if it is dangerous. Ben-GVIR are members of the cabinet and they have more internal discussions. They may think this is just political pressure on Hamas to come to the table.”

Outside Israel, it attracted the proposal of a new camp for all Ghazan widespread criticism.

In the United Kingdom, the Middle East Minister Hamish Falcon posted on social media that it was “horrific” from the plan.

“The Palestinian territories should not be less,” he wrote. “Civilians should be able to return to their societies. We need to move towards a ceasefire deal and open a path to permanent peace.”

British human rights lawyer, Baroneh, told Helena Kennedy KECBC that the project would force the Palestinians to “the detention camp.”

The description, which was used by other critics including academics, NGOs and senior United Nations officials, carries a great resonance in light of the role of the Holocaust detention camps.

Baroneh Kennedy said that the plan – as well as the latest measures for Israel – led her to conclude that Israel is committing the genocide in Gaza.

“I was very hesitant to go there, because the threshold should be very high. There must be a specific intention for genocide. But what we see now is the behavior of genocide,” she said.

Israel strongly rejected the charge of genocide and says it does not target civilians.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry also told the BBC that “the idea that Israel creates very offensive detention camps and directed similarities with the Nazis.” He added that Israel “adheres to the Geneva Agreement,” referring to the international regulations that govern the treatment of civilians in the occupied territories.

Regardless of the dark warnings about what may happen, the possibility of a new camp has an impact on the efforts made to end the Gaza war.

The Palestinian sources told the ceasefire talks that the grinding in the Qatari capital had told the BBC that the plan raised the concern of the Hamas delegation and created a new obstacle to a deal.

Participated in additional reports by Joyce Liu and John Landy