Analysts say that Trump’s Gaza’s plan is not applicable. Does that mean?

President Trump’s plan for Put Gaza under American occupation Its Palestinian population has been transferred to two million Israeli Palestinian residents, the terrified Palestinians, and they shocked the Arab American allies and the confusing regional analysts who saw this unprecedented.

For some experts, the idea was unlikely – will Mr. Trump really risk the American forces in another difficult battle against armed Islamists in the Middle East? – They wondered whether it was just the opening of the opening in a new round of negotiations on the future of Gaza.

To the Israeli right, Mr. Trump’s plan revealed contracts of unwanted Orthodoxy on the Israeli -Palestinian conflict, which sparked the possibility of canceling the militant threat in Gaza without the need to create a Palestinian state. In particular, settler leaders praised that they could eventually resettle Gaza with Jewish civilians-a long desire.

For the Palestinians, the proposal constitutes an ethnic cleansing on a more terrifying scale than any displacement they witnessed since 1948, when it was about 800,000 Arabs. Exhaustion or forced to flee During the wars surrounding the establishment of the Jewish state.

“Hey”, Palestinian political analyst, Palestinian political analyst, who was displaced from his home during the war, said. “The Palestinians prefer to live in tents next to their destroyed homes rather than moving to another place.”

“Very important”, Itamar Bin Ghaffir, the Israeli extremist legislator and the leader of the settlers, wrote in Social media publication. “The only solution for Gaza is to encourage Ghazan’s migration.”

“Comedy”, political commentator and former Israeli ambassador, said. “This makes the Canada accessories and buying Greenland look more practical.”

But this is the external external plan that indicated some that it was not supposed to be taken literally.

Just as Mr. Trump often made bold threats in another place that he did not eventually, some saw that the maneuver in Gaza was a negotiation tactic aimed at imposing concessions from Hamas and from Arab leaders.

In Gaza, Hamas has not yet agreed to give up the entire authority, a position that makes the Israeli government less likely to cease fire. Elsewhere in the region, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia refuses to normalize relations with Israel, or assist in Gaza governance after the war, unless Israel is It agrees to establish a Palestinian state.

Israeli and Palestinian analysts said that Mr. Trump’s extreme plans may have been an attempt to make both sides change their positions.

In the face of the choice between maintaining its own control over Gaza and maintaining a Palestinian presence there, Hamas may settle on the latter, according to Michael Milchain, the Israeli analyst for Palestinian affairs.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is urged to abandon its insistence on the Palestinian state and stability instead to obtain a deal that preserves the right of the Palestinians to remain in Gaza but not their right to sovereignty, according to Professor Abu Dosa, the Palestinian political scientist.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia rejected Mr. Trump’s plan quickly on Wednesday, and issued a statement that confirmed its support for the Palestinian state. But some still believe that the Saudi position can change. During the previous period of Mr. Trump, in 2020, the United Arab Emirates provided a similar compromise when it agreed Normalization of relations with Israel In exchange for the postponement of Israel’s annexation of the West Bank.

“Trump shows the maximum pressure against Hamas to intimidate them, so they make real concessions,” said Professor Abu Posada. “I also think it uses the maximum pressure against the region, so they will settle for less normalization with Israel. Exactly as the United Arab Emirates did.”

Israeli analysts said that Mr. Trump gave the Israeli right a reason to support the extension of the ceasefire.

More than a year ago, the allies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened the right -wing coalition if the war with Hamas is still in power. Now, these scattered people have external grants-pledged from the largest ally of Israel on the empty Palestinians at some point in the future.

“At the right time, they will need to see some of the evidences that are already taking place,” said Nadaf Strachsler, former adviser to Mr. Netanyahu, in reference to these right -wing elements.

But at the present time, he added, “They will be more patience.”

Gabi Sobilman It contributed to the reports of Revoff, Israel.