Analysis: Israel jumped on the red lines in the attack on the Qatari capital Israeli conflict news

Israel had no intention to cover up its involvement in Tuesday’s attack on Doha – within minutes of The explosions that hear In the Qatari capital, Israeli officials were demanding responsibility in the media.

It was not long before, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was publicly responsible for attacking many Hamas leaders.

Recommended stories

List of 3 elementsThe end of the list

“Israel beganThe statement said that Israel conducted it, and Israel is fully responsible.

The attack represents another escalation by Israel – the latest in a series that included the launch of a war against Iran, and occupies more lands in Syria, killing the leadership of the Lebanese group Hezbollah, and killing more than 64,500 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip since its war began there.

But this attack represents new borders in what Israel believes it can escape from: a direct attack on the US ally – Qatar It hosts the largest American military base in the region – which was leading negotiations to secure the ceasefire deal and the release of Israeli prisoners from Gaza.

“We have seen that Israel is going through crowded and residential areas and in capitals throughout the Middle East as they like,” Mayiraf Zonsin, the chief analyst of Israel in the Israel Group, told Al Jazerara: “She is still doing it, and you will continue to do this, (if no one) takes a serious action to stop it.”

The attack was surprised by many because it exceeded what the Palestinian defense analyst Hamzi Atar called “traditional Mossad (Israeli intelligence)”, such as assassinations through car bombs, poison, snipers or snipers.

He said: “I do not think … Qatar expects that Israel will bomb Doha.”

“The Qataris knew that they were not completely out of the border, but it is clear that no one expected the direct attack, and only the challenge and recklessness that was not surprised by it, I would like to say, everyone.”

Israel has so far obtained a little retreat from its actions from the United States – both during the era of current President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden. In the first comments from the White House on the attack, a statement issued by Trump said that while the United States was informed of the attack, Israel carried out the attack unilaterally. The statement added that the attack did not attend the Israeli or American targets, but hitting Hamas was “a goal worth.”

“I do not think, analytically, that Israel will carry out any such attack without an American green light,” said the island’s chief political analyst Marwan Bishara. “If America does not already give a green light, then we must hear an upcoming condemnation at any moment … The Trump administration needs to be condemned by its agent, Israel, while the negotiations (the ceasefire) continues.”

The end of the ceasefire negotiations?

These negotiations discuss the ceasefire a deal that Trump paid for himself, but with the warning the American president to issue his own threats to Hamas and Gaza not to reach an agreement.

It implicitly was that the Palestinian group was the main obstacle to the deal – but in reality, Hamas agreed to stop the previous shooting proposals, only to find Israel reject the deals that it had previously agreed, or change the negotiating parameters.

The Trump administration had previously paid a deal that would include the partial release of Israeli prisoners and temporarily stopping the fighting, during which negotiations will continue for a permanent end of war.

But Israel refused that after its support in the beginning, and the current deal, which suggested that Hamas call for all the prisoners, but it only gets a temporary stop in the fighting.

In addition to the continuous military operation of Israel in Gaza City, where all Palestinians demanded to leave and insist on destroying Hamas, it appears that Israel is planning to continue its war, whatever the result of the negotiations.

“I think the bottom line here is that it is clear that Israel is not interested in any kind of ceasefire, or negotiations for the ceasefire, (and) that the reports related to Trump’s proposal to negotiate with Hamas, whatever this revised new offer, everything was premature and theater,” said Zonszein.

She added: “Of course, there is no expectation that the exit of the political leadership (Hamas) in Doha will be a kind of changing the strategic game in the Israeli war on Gaza.”

Other analysts agreed with this perspective.

“Israel has taken its contempt for negotiations, for the international professionalism of the states and respect for the states to a new level of transparency,” said Daniel Levy, head of the United States/Middle East project and former Israeli negotiator in the 1990s. “We should have long been overcome the point that there was any doubt from any fair person about whether Israel was negotiating in good faith.”

Qatar’s reaction

Qatar has long been a role as a regional and international mediator, while maintaining good relations with both the United States and Iran, for example.

Although it does not have relations with Israel, Qatar has hosted Israeli negotiators for ceasefire talks since the beginning of the war in October 2023, and previously coordinated with Israel to provide assistance to Gaza before the war.

Abdullah Al -Amadi, a writer and journalist based in Doha, said: “Qatar is one of the countries that try to difficult to calm the situation in Gaza and get the two parties out of the current war … but Israel has not recognized these efforts.”

But Qatar began dragging it into regional violence, with an attack by Iran on the American base in Al -Wadid in June – which Iran has not been directed to Qatar – and now the Israeli attack in Doha.

Imamiyyah believes that Qatar will try to “attract more international attention to the Israeli regime’s violations of all international laws and agreements” at the United Nations General Assembly meeting within a few days.

Qatar’s efforts to “mobilize international public opinion to pressure Israel to present and respect the sovereignty of states,” Al -Amadi said.

The Middle East fellow at the Baker Policy Institute at the University of Rice, said that he expects officials from Qatar and the Cooperation Council in the broader Gulf.

“If it is accurate, then (that) strikes at the heart of the security and defense partnership in the United States, in ways that Iran’s strike was not against Qatar in June,” Ulrichsen said.

Analysts added that regional countries needed to gather to retreat against Israel.

“The American bases and the American military forces hosted an effective form of deterrence, (but this has now evaporated.” The response of the Gulf Cooperation Council may be aware that American security guarantees are no longer valuable as it was believed to be for a long time. “

“No one is already safe, and there is nothing outside the table,” said Bianco. “Of course, it also has effects on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, etc.”.

Levy said: “Every state in the region must have an interest in ending this impunity because the Israeli Air Force and its bombs are coming to your area if it does not gather to stop on that.”

“The question must be asked and our choice in front of the United States: Do you want relations with the rest of the region? Or do you want to indulge in Israeli crime?”