American federal workers stipulate their contacts in the climate of fear caused by Dog

In late February, the US Agency for International Development Agency (the United States Agency for International Development) was invited to their offices in 15 -minute windows to collect their property. They went out, some of them crying, carrying boxes of personal things-but many of them were concerned about the personal information they were leaving in the US agency’s office systems.

The specified concern was the government efficiency management (DOGE), the bureaucratic transportation group established by the Trump administration. Nobody knows exactly what the group’s personal data.

“Fears relate to Doug’s ability, to monitor them,” said one of the employees on an administrative vacation, who came out of the American Agency for International Development on that day. He does not want to use his name for fear of repercussions.

The staff, likewise, turned the encrypted signal to chat with each other about what was happening. Nearly 90 to 95 percent of his fellow employees were demobilized after Dog’s dismantling of the agency.

It is in seven signal talks on a set of topics of litigation and job exhibitions to how to restore US foreign aid in the future.

“I am used to using it in closed societies,” he said. “It is clear that we do not think this will be the case here in the United States.”

People associated with Doge The forced coalition entered on February 1Saturday, and sought to access employee information. The Associated Press reported that the team entered what is known as Scif – a sensitive information attachment – a room inside the office and possible sensitive information can be accessed. Dog did not answer CBC questions about these allegations.

Taylor Williamson has worked on the contracts of the US Agency for International Development through a partner organization over the past twenty years. It has been demobilized now.

“When everyone started leave at the end of January, we all started sending text messages to each other to say,” Are you okay? He said.

“Because of the influence of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, people are truly afraid or wrong from sharing their data with the government,” he said.

“Given the presence of these technological people running in the government, there was a great fear.”

On Tuesday, a federal judge decided that Musa’s efforts and his team to close the US International Development Agency Most likely violated the constitution “In multiple ways.” They were ordered to “not disclose the US Agency for International Development, that is, … information or personal information contained in the individual’s employee file, the security clearance file.”

David Karbaf, associate professor at George Washington University, whose work focuses on strategic communication and internet -related strategies, says the dangerous part of all this.

He said: “The Dog team in Trump has repeatedly arrived at the citizen’s data that was previously outside the borders.”

“He has never been unprecedented that it is difficult to find words for her,” he said, adding that the sign is the only safe place to chat federal workforce because it cannot be reached by the government. He said that Dog can access email and other information on the work devices.

Personal information security has become a dramatic workforce reduction as a concern that the Washington Post published a story in early February with the main address Federal workers: Here is how to hold your connections. The article indicated that the possibility of threats to personal security has increased since the new administration came with its links to technology executives such as Meta’s Zuckerberg and Amazon from Jeff Bezos and Musk. He highlighted how Dog attracted “wide quantities of data” for employees from federal agencies.

One of the main recommendations was to use the signal for texts, because an application like messenger, for example, is owned by Meta and collects more descriptive data. Other suggestions carefully included choosing who communicates with such applications.

“Simply the strangest time in my entire life.” Says

“We do not know what Dog reached, and this is the great fear,” he said, adding that he moved to the face and the bilateral definition in everything, and he holds personal credit systems, motivated by concern that the person who can sell the social security number.

Chester said he understood the reason for using people. The American Foreign Services Association advises people not to use government agencies, but rather personal devices instead.

“The anxiety is that the government will use information against you to end. Your security permit may be canceled. There are permanent effects with various levels of security permits,” he said.

The association’s website has links to the “Go Virtual Go bag” stating, “Everyone in the external service knows what” Go bag “… but how many of us have a” bag “for employment. This type of virtual protection includes downloading personal files from work devices, according to the site, as well as to obtain personal liability insurance and thinking about setting information about personal credit to prevent them from obfuscation at the expense of credit.

Chester hopes to provide the continuous legal procedure against Doug and hold some clarity.

“I hope that Dog is called to testify so that we can know the data they collected, and why they took it and why they need it,” he said.

Meanwhile, federal workforce phones in Washington light up with encrypted applications and chats as people carefully share information while trying to discover their future.