After the Antarbur is settled in one billion dollars, the dictionaries are sustained by artificial intelligence

Recently $ 1.5 billion settlement The flood gates can open for more publishers to prosecute AI companies about how they use copyright -protected content.

Only this week, the Britannica Group, the mother of the Britannica Encyclopedia and the Merriam-Webster dictionary, filed a lawsuit against confusion. On Wednesday in a federal court in New York, complaint AI Buzzy AI, which is the violation of the rights of copyright and brands in Britanica and demands his answers to the expiration of the publisher’s revenue.

The confusion, founded in 2022, is called “Swiss Army knife that works from artificial intelligence to discover information and curiosity.” The company recently topped the headlines in August when it made a file $ 34.5 billion to buy Google Chrome browser.

Perplexity is famous for the answer engine, which pulls data from all over the web and provides quick and easy -to -read summaries for user questions. Bretanica says these summaries often lift their content literally without permission, and to transform readers who may visit their positions, and traffic relies the company on subscriptions and declarations.

“Al -Hirah claims to be” the first answer engine in the world, “said Jorge Koz, CEO of Brittanica, but the answers they provide to consumers are often the answers of Britanica.” press release.

This is not the first legal battle for confusion. Last year, Dow Jones of Robert Murdoch, the parent company of the Wall Street Journal and New York Post, accused the startup. Illegally copying her work.

However, this new lawsuit lands after only weeks The anthropier agreed to pay $ 1.5 billion To settle claims, millions of pirated books have been used to train Chatbot, indicating that lawsuits from publishers may lead to great compensation.

Since the appearance of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT and CLADE, publishers have made technology companies pay for their content. Artificial intelligence companies rely on published materials and are often protected by copyright rights such as web sites, newspapers, magazines and books to train large language models and answer user questions.

Openai, for example, is still fighting 2023 Claims from the New York TimesAlthough it and Google have entered into licensing deals with outlets such as News Corp and I respondedRespectively, to avoid more clashes. The same confusion announced in August that it would start soon Exchange some of its revenues With publishers who use their news articles to answer the user’s questions.

Why do you sue Pretanica confused?

Brettanica’s complaint says that confusion has scattered its sites, copies and republishing articles without permission, and even the proportions generated from artificial intelligence that may harm the reputation of the brand. Bretanica argues that these procedures violate both the Copyright and Trade Law.

In addition, Britannica says it can create content thanks to the money it gets through subscriptions and advertising revenues. It accuses the answer to the confusion of riding these investments through a “movement of human meat movement” to its positions.

The company seeks to obtain unspecified cash compensation and a court order using more use for its content.

The confusion did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo.