A small army of excessive Tiktokers will not save the Democratic Party

By all standards, the Democratic Party should be running at the present time.

Its political enemy, the Trump administration, has entered the era of imbalance and corruption at the federal level that is unparalleled in the modern era. Under the curtain reducing the size of the federal government and updating Don’t be popular With the majority of the American people – whether it spoils social benefits programs such as social security and medical care, or setting a tariff system that registration of small companies, or threatens to destroy the US Health Agency.

For any opposition party, it appears that the FAUX-Pas-Pass agenda is a political opportunity to be taken to exploit.

However, in some way, Democrats were not more popular. A large number of modern opinion polls have found that the Democrats are increasingly viewed as weak, ineffective and “lost” by their voters. At the same time, the party suffers Registration crisisIt also seems that large numbers of voters are fleeing the party. The consensus seems to be that the Democrats stand for nothing, and they cannot do anything, and they cannot stand up to Trump.

The clear crisis of faith that suffers from the party base will explain the story of this week from WirelessWhich revealed an alleged secret arrangement between a group of influencers on social media and a dark money group aligned to the Democrats. It seems that the influencers, who have great followers in sites like Tiktok and Instagram, appeared to have offered a month worth $ 8 to amplify “democratic correspondence on the Internet”, as the report claims. Write wireless:

Democrats hope that the Creator Serper Secretive incubators, which is funded by a strong set of liberal dark money called The Sixteen Thirty Fund, raises the standards. The program started last month, and the creators of the creators concerned that more than 90 influencers had been appointed to participate. Wire creators told that the contract stipulates that they will be expelled and mainly cut off if they admitted that they were part of the program. Some creators also raised concerns about a large number of sentences restricted in the contract.

… According to copies of the contract presented by WIRED signed by the creators, the influencers are not allowed to reveal their relationship with the choir or the thirtieth sixteen fund – or functional, where they are paid at all.

Since then, STF has opposed parts of the report, if not the part of the left -wing effect. When it was reached for the comment, a SF spokesman said that Chorus was doing a “decisive action to publish a pro -democracy message to the Americans” and it seems that it denies parts of the wire report, claiming specifically that creators “have always been encouraged to talk about their participation in the program.” Regardless of the accurate conditions of the contract, and despite the fact that the report does not mention any direct links between the process and DNC, it does not require much to see this type of quiet web marketing as the future of the campaign strategy on the Internet.

Oh, how the great fell. At some point, Democrats were seen as applying to the political race to control the Internet. In fact, Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign is seen as a Masterclass in digital marketingOne Social media with benefit And other online tools are not just a way to collect donations, but also as a way to recruit and retain contemporary ways that have not been explained before.

Of course, Obama’s collapse campaign occurred when Facebook was only four years old and Twitter (i.e. It was still called Twitter At that time) barely born. Many have changed since then, and in this temporary period, the conservatives fought strongly to bridge the digital skills gap. In the wake of Obama’s election directly, the Republican Party is scrambling to find out the error she made.

“The left was in front of us,” Eric Teleford saidIn the strategy of the group of American conservative Americans for prosperity, in 2009. Since then, the Republican Party and its allies have increased skill in benefiting from digital platforms in their favor.

The Republican Party has benefited from a group of politicians and representatives in the private sector who are Simpatico with its agenda. Steve Bannon, the mastermind of Trump’s 2016 presidential victory, has benefited from the psychopath (Cambridge Analytical) to target potential voters with political messages. Likewise, during this last election, Trump enjoyed the support of Elon Musk, who owns X, a platform that was carried out by the non -engraved Maga advertisement in the period before the elections last year.

Now, it can be easily said that the Maga-Adjacent forces control large parts of the online information system in which most Americans live. ” Whether it is Podcast circle directed towards males That helped Trump elected (thanks Joe Rogan!It is an environmental system for non -engraved alternative media sites (sites such as Rumble and Kick that mainly act as an online equivalent for the AM) or Fox News or many social media platforms that act as oceanic messages (for example, X, Truth Social, Parler), it is clear that the forces conservative have an advantage.

In contrast, what is the new digital communication strategy that Democrats have reached since 2008? You will be attempted to think about an answer. Thus, the last invasion of mysterious influential marketing – a strategy, for all intentions and purposes, appears devoid of imagination or creativity. However, the focus is too much on the means that Democrats reach their message is to distract from the real problem that the party already faces: they have no message.

Or, at least, the message that the party does not seem to be its voters want to hear it. An example of this: Critics recently claimed that all Democrats need to overcome their conservative opponents, “Joe Rogan”. However, conducting a recent interview conducted by comedy actor Bodkster Adam Friedland, who sometimes called “”Joe Rogan from the left,“Not much hope was presented on that front. The interview with Richie Torres, which, in more happy times, was motivated as a future face of the political party of aging on a large scale.

However, recently, there has been a great daylight between the ideals of Torres and the party base queens. A a report This week, Torres, a “pro -Israel” democratic described, was urging the White House to “accelerate the surrender to Israel to Israel” at the same time that “he added defense contractors such as Lockheed and Nortrub to his wallet” (the companies that you know, most of these gloves). During an interview this week, Friedland asked Torres with questions about the death toll in Gaza, in which Torres appears to be bored, truly bored, Just he kept saying “War is a tragedy” with the same emotional record that you use to order a sandwich in the subway. Contrary to the alleged efforts of the Democrats of Astroturf Tiktok with glowing support, Fredland Verusal interview has become.

In short, even when “Joe Rogan is involved in the left”, Democrats collapse when they are asked to defend their policies. If you cannot answer a simple question like, “Will innocent civilians kill something bad?” There is no great hope for your success in long interviews.

Democrats have struggled to answer the basic questions about their policies because doing this would present the fact that the party deeply with its base. In fact, the Democratic Party line is still an unambiguous support for Israel, despite the fact that recently Quinnipiac University poll I found that 77 percent of Democrats believe that they commit the genocide in Gaza. Democrats are still very uncomfortable criticizing the American billionaire layer, although the truth Another poll It was found that 54 percent of liberal Democrats do not believe that billionaires should be present. A recent survey of registered Democrats found that the vast majority of Bernie Sanders’ point of view (is more popular than AOC, Chuck Schumer and Gavin Newsom, and according to Another pollOnly secondly to Pope and Volodimir Zellinski in the national popularity), but as much as it can be distinguished, the leadership of the Democratic Party is seen as an intertwined ostrich to be transformed and canceled at every turn.

Whether they use a clip from MSNBC, Bullhorn, TIKTOK, or simply stand at the corner of a street screaming, it will be very difficult for Democrats to get messages that they do not agree mainly.