A new study reveals the cause of endurance

The British polar explorer, Sir Ernst Henry Shalaklon, created his place in the annuals of history after ensuring that his entire crew remains after the shipwreck. to bear in 1915. A new paper sheds light on the state of the notorious ship – and what Shatkalton knew before the launch.

Jukka Tuhkuri, a polar explorer and researcher specializing in ice mechanics and marine pole technology at Alto University in Finland, revealed this to bear He was not as strong as he was widespread, and Shacelton knew the structural deficiencies. His work adds the differences to one of the most famous survival stories for 100 years on the death of the explorer Three years ago, since he and the rest of the task of endure were found 22 wreckage.

Juvenile

In August 1914Shatkalton and his crew sailed from England. The Empire Campaign Cross Cross Aim To achieve the first Berri crossing in the Antarctic continent. The plan for a hiking team was From the sea and denotes the southern pole to the Russian Sea, but the main crystal ship to bear He stumbled into the ice pack in 1915 and finally crushed it, drowned underwater in November. The 28 crew members survived the ice before using boats to reach the island of the elephant. From there, a small team, including SHKKLETON, sailed 800 miles (1300 km) to the island of southern Georgia for help. By September 1916, everyone to bear The crew was rescued without losing one life.

“Even simple structural analysis shows that the ship was not designed for the compressed packages of ice that eventually sank,” said Tukuri at Aalto University statement. “The risk of moving ice and compressive loads – and how a ship designed for such circumstances – was a good concept before the ship sails south. So we really have to wonder why Shalkson chose a bowl that has not been strengthened for compression snow.”

According to Tuhkuri, to bear It is widely believed to be the most powerful polar ship of its time, but with one failure – a problem with the helm – which will lead to an unfortunate end. By combining technical analysis and archival research in A. Ticket Today in Polar Record, the researcher revealed this defective perception.

“to bear “It was clear that he had many structural deficiencies compared to other ships in the Antarctic,” he said. The packets and deck tires were weaker, and the machine cabin was longer, which led to a serious weakness in an important part of the structure, as well as the lack of Qatari packages to enhance the structure. Not only that this challenge in the romantic narration was that it was the most powerful polar ship of its time, but it is also the simplistic idea that the rudder was the heel of the ship’s Achilles. “

Why did Shakelton sacrifice to bear?

Despite the investigation of Shackleton diaries, personal correspondence and other communications from the crew, Tukuri is not sure why Shackleton decided to sail with to bear. He was aware of the problems of the ship – Toukouri said that the explorer complained from this to his wife before the campaign began, wishing his previous ship.

“In fact, he had recommended Qatari symptoms of another polar charging when visiting the Norwegian Ship Building Basin. This ship itself stumbled in compressed snow for several months and survived,” Tukuri continued.

As such, the paper demands an interesting question. Was the ship “bad overcoming”, or was it bad calls in its heart? Tuhkuri, however, chose to leave it without an answer. While he hopes that his research will contribute to a new view of our understanding of the ship, he says that he does not try to reduce Shatkalton and accomplish his crew.

“We can speculate on financial pressure or temporal restrictions, but the fact is that we may never know why the options have taken the options. At least we now have tangible results to embody stories.”