A new edition of the living forest book that everyone has forgotten

Rhodiard Kibling published his novel “The Jungle Book” in 1894, and “The Second Forest Book”, the following year. The books followed the adventures of a boy named Mwgli, who is five years old, was lost in the jungles of India, which was transferred by local wildlife. The forest methods were taught, most of them by the charitable tiger called Bagheera. He also gets some loud tips from a bear called Palu, and he learns to be cautious about the evil tiger, Sherry Khan.

Most schoolchildren have read one or both of them from the “Jungle Book” novels from Kipling, and they were adapted to photograph several times. Director Zoltan Kurda made a fairly great version for 1946, although it is more popular for today’s fans is the 1967 animation movie, directed by Wolfgang Reheterman. Walt Disney was credited as a producer, but he died shortly before the “The Jungle Book”, making it one of the last films that he worked on directly. The moving version is light and Jazi, and her songs were singing by the Sherman brothers on their way to the minds of anyone heard.

Enjoyable trivial: The song “I WAN’NA like you”, was performed by Luis Barima in the film, Romanman, of course, reused by In the 2016 Jon Favreau edition of “The Jungle Book”. Favrio should admire the song, because in 1996, he also included it on the soundtrack to the “Al -Agha”, a movie he wrote and returned.

There was an additional adaptation to “The Jungle Book”, however, by the modern Disney scientists. Buena Vista Pictures (former Disney imprint) distributed a vivid version of “The Jungle Book” in 1994. This version of Jasson Scott Lee stars in the role of an adult reservation, and shows from Carrie Elweiz, Lina Heidai, Sam Neil, and John Cleals. It was directed by Stephen Somers, the mastermind of the B-Movie behind “Deep Rianing”, “The Mummy” and “Van Helsing”.

The most prominent creative wrinkles in “The Jungle Book” is that animals do not speak. Mowgli can communicate with them, but they do not have simple English conversations as in other amendments mentioned above. In fact, the story highlights more than “Tarzan of the Apes” more than “The Jungle Book”, with a great focus on British colonists and the re -introduction of Mwgli to civilization. There is a subcontinent, also, about the Elwes character looking for a lost golden city, kidnapping and torturing the information. The film was only classified PG, but it is clear that it aims to be “more exciting” than the 1967 version that came before it.

The film was not a great success, as it achieved $ 70 million with a budget of 30 million dollars after slipping into the theaters during the 1994 Christmas season. This was a crowded season that also included movies and/or Oscar taste like “Nell”, “Little Women”, “Dumb and Dumber”, “Disclosure” and “Legends of the Fall”. And, uh, “street fighter”. Jason Scott Lee is very good like Mapeli, although he stands out more for his handsome face and his shiny muscle more than his performance. Since the animals do not speak, one may see that the movie Sommers is the secular version of “The Jungle Book”, which is more interested in adventures and wealth than the knowledge that humans can learn from the natural world. Compared to other live Disney films in the afternoon, “The Jungle Book” definitely feels more maturity and neglect. Alsumarz succeeded in this regard.

The film also received enough decent reviews. It currently has an 80 % approval rate on spoiled tomatoes, based on 45 reviews. Some critics have indicated that it is barely outperforming the release of 1967, which leads to accusations of performance.

“The Jungle Book” may also be the first example of the redesign of Disney, one of its well -known animated films. Gilin, close to “101 Dalmations”, came after that, and the trend was shipped in 2010 With the release of “Alice in Wonderland” by Tim Burton, But “The Jungle Book” is the real previous.