A draft law to condemn the Bulder’s attack on pro -Israel activists sees more than 100 Dems who vote for no

More than 100 Democrats voted against the Republican Parliament’s decision to condemn the terrorist attack accused in Bulder, Colorado.

It has passed 280 – 113, with 75 democratic joining Republicans to vote in favor of the bill. Six of the legislators – five democrats and one Republic – “present”.

The legislation was presented by Representative Gabi Evans, R-COLO, last week in response to the attack.

But Democratic lawmakers made it clear that they were opposing the language in the decision that they felt was a political charged.

In addition to condemning the attack, Ivan’s decision to reprimand the states of the blue tendencies that were at odds with the federal immigration authorities-with the condemnation of illegal immigrants who also exceeded their visas.

They referred to the case of Muhammad Sabri Suleiman, who exceeded a tourist visa and a later work license, “clarifying the risks of not removing foreigners in the country who fail to comply with the conditions of their visas.”

The decision also confirms that free and open communication between local law enforcement and law enforcement and their federal counterparts are still the basis for public safety and is necessary in preventing terrorist attacks “and expresses his gratitude to law enforcement employees, including American immigration employees and customs, to protect the country.”

This comes at a time when Democratic dominated cities such as Los Angeles and Nafeville witnessed that their leaders criticize the Trump administration’s ice campaign.

Dealing with the Trump administration of anti -ice -riots in Los Angeles stimulated the flow of democratic officials, especially the decision to send the National Guard forces to dismantle the demonstrations.

The leader of the minority in the House of Representatives, Hakim Jeffrez, DN.Y, criticized Evans’s decision in the comments on correspondents on Monday.

“Who is this man? He does not care seriously about combating anti -Semitism in America. This is not a serious effort,” said Jeffrez. “Enthusiasm is a lesion on America. It should not be made politically.”

Jeffrez Evans also called a “joke”.

Evans strongly responded to X, “Our nation has served in the uniform in the Middle East, as a policeman in Colorado, and now as a member of Congress. These offensive offensive feelings are the reason for continuing anti -Semitism. The left is not clear in finding real solutions.”

Representative Dan Goldman, DN.Y. And he is a Jew, also criticized Evans’s decision.

Goldman said during the discussion on the draft law.

But MP Jeff van Drew, RN.J. , Who leads a decision of the two parties, which condemns anti -Semitism, but does not discuss migration, defended the Ivank scale.

“Yes, it is different from me. I focused on me purely on anti -Semitism here in the world. But it puts a valid point not only for Jews, but for many innocent victims. Whether it is retreating, they were not in a state of rape, and they are not less than women.

This is a break file. Count more updates