Justin’s lawyer says the actor is “destroyed” by Blake Livley’s lawsuit

During the recent appearance of podcasts, the lawyer said that his client was “destroyed” because of the accusations, and the only way to clean his reputation was to prove his innocence.

Brian Friedman also explained why Justin Baldouni has created a website on the Internet to post his allegations against Blake Livley.

Since December, she has participated in Doni and Levi in ​​a controversial legal dispute, as the actress accused her star participating in sexual harassment and other allegations.

The situation has since deteriorated to a media war between the lawyers of both parties. He also raised an anti -pulsating and against one against New York Times To inform her of the allegations made by the actress.

As matters continued, it was unlikely to be the possibility of a settlement on the preliminary lawsuit by a lawyer, Friedman.

Lawyer on Podcast, “The City”, where the host, Matthew Belloni, suggested that he be without stability because of the “circus and damage to both sides” in the experiment.

In response, Friedman cleaned the “circus” narration while also showing that allegations have caused deep damage to the country.

“The truth is that this is not a circus when you experience such a experience,” said Friedman for every circus. US weekly. “I have represented many people in the worst moments of their career, and the worst moments of their lives. Justin has destroyed this.”

In his speech, it seemed that Friedman explained that the settlement would not allow the country to prove his innocence against Levli’s accusations.

“On this day and this era, the only way you can return is to prove your innocence, and this is what we are doing actively (do),” Share. “This may only be able to do it in the courtroom.”

The accusations, which Friedmann have indicated as “a really dangerous thing”, include claims that Baldoni has introduced unsuccessful and undesirable kisses during filming, and often talked about struggles with pornography addiction and detailed sexual experiments, and entered their trailer without permission during their patronage.

Lavelli also accused the director of the film of leading a distortion campaign against it and included texts that support these allegations.

In the wake of the sexual harassment case, he denying the allegations and creating a later website, as it detailed its own version of the story.

According to Freedman, Baldoni took an expected step to respond to the apparently promoted narrative in the New York Times story.

The lawyer said, “The moment the New York Times story came out, Justin was all purposes and purposes,” the lawyer said.

He added: “The public opinion court was against him. There was no side he had in this. There were no facts next to him … It was really important to come up with real real facts.”

Friedman also said that the site has made access to all relevant materials easier for those looking for the truth about it.

“The site is actually the culmination of the general pleadings that can be accessed to the public and have been presented and easily accessible,” the lawyer commented. “It is a place where you can find things.”

Since the initial deposit, Lively has updated her suit to include defamation as she also claimed that she was not the only one that Baldoni did not comfortably on the group “It ends with us”.

Jed Wallace and the Texas -based company, Street Relaces, as a defendant in her complaint, accused of working with Baldoni to distort her.

Meanwhile, its legal team summoned cellular transport companies to obtain “receipts” to help its dispute against the film director.

Her lawyers said in a statement at the time: “Mrs. Livly began a discovery that would present people, tactics and methods that worked to” destroy “and” buried “her heard and family during the past year.”

Unfortunately, her request was rejected by the judge who heads the case; However, Lively recently scored a legal victory in court.

Judge Luis Lehman granted a protective request to Levy in her legal battle with the blogging, but the court limited the restrictions it sought.

Levli and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, asked Judge Leman to put a preventive order before they revealed talks with “high -level” at the time “that he ends with us”, because they are afraid that they would leak them without the press.

according to People MagazineThe judge ruled that while some secret materials remain protected, the name “lawyers” can only be applied unless it is very likely that the detection of commercial, commercial, financial or important businesses will be applied.

“When the confidential information of the media is not revealed, it may spread through gossip and hint of those in the narrow technical community in a situation that allows it to harm one or another on both sides, but in a way that may not be discovered easily and immediately.”

Currently, a pilot date for Baldoni and Lively for the month of March 2026 has been set, while before trial suggestions are still ongoing.