German counsel

On Saturday, Chancellor Ollaf Schools, from Germany, accused Vice President GD Vans of unacceptable intervention in his country’s imminent elections on behalf of a party that has reduced the atrocities committed by the Nazis 80 years ago.

A day later Mr. Vans amazed the Munich Security Conference By informing German leaders of dropping the so -called protection wall and allowing the hard right alternative to Germany, or AFD, to enter by fascists who can repeat the horrors of the Holocaust.

“Never reconcile” again “with the support of AFD.”

Mr. Schouls said that AFD has led to the interpretations of the Nazis like Dachau detention campAnd that Mr. Vans visited on Friday. He said that Germany “will not accept” directives from strangers on how to manage its democracy – and certainly does not work with such a party.

“This is not done, and certainly not between friends and allies,” said Mr. Schouls. “Our democracy goes from here is to decide.”

Mr. Schulz’s comments were the latest in a series of criticism of the speech of Mr. Vans from German politicians, including Friedrich Mirz, a conservative Christian Democrats, who lead opinion polls in the elections of the advisor next week. Social Democrats of Mr. Schulz ranked third or fourth in most opinion polls. AFD ranked second, and her candidate, Alice Wadel, met on Friday in Munich.

No party in the German parliament will join AFD to form a government. Parts of AFD were classified as extremist by German intelligence. Some of its members were convicted of violating German law against the use of Nazi slogans. Others were arrested for their attempt to overthrow the federal government.

This group aviation of AFD and other extremist parties is known as the Wall of the Protection. Mr. Vans took the goal on Friday, saying that AFD and the other right parties across Europe have represented the legitimate voters’ legitimate concerns about high levels of migration to European countries from the Middle East and other places.

“There is no room for protection walls,” said Mr. Vance.

The attendees in the speech of Mr. Vans on Friday expected to hear the details of the Trump administration’s plans for peace talks in Ukraine and the policies of defending NATO. Instead, they heard the vice president calling for the restrictions on freedom of expression a greater threat to Europe than the military aggression from Russia or China.

Mr. Schults dismantled Mr. Vanced for this focus in a question and answers session after his speech. He was asked by Zani Menton Bedz, the Economist’s Economist, if Mr. Vans had made any points in his speech worth thinking about it.

“You mean all these relevant discussions about Ukraine and security in Europe?” Mr. Schools said, he draws laughter from the audience.

Then he addressed the criticism of Mr. Vans for European speech restrictions directly.

“We must be very clear that freedom of expression in Europe means that you do not attack others in ways against the legislation and laws that we have in our country,” said Mr. Schouls. “This is the case. There is no difference between the difference between the digital world and the analog world to say like this. We must be very clear that hate and all this, which is very bad for our societies, should not be the truth of the general debate.”