Why can the major countries not agree on how to organize artificial intelligence

More than 60 countries gathered in Paris this week to obtain the Amnesty International Summit, which was supposed to bring together global powers together to set a global agenda on fast developing technology. Instead, some of them have shown sharply diverge.

Over the past few years, the European Union has followed an aggressive organization for large technology, as it has achieved in major American companies such as Google and Apple and passing many laws that facilitate close supervision of their activities. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has made technology editing an essential part of its agenda, and promised to remove the red tape that the industry says suffocates innovation.

Therefore, when dozens of countries, including Canada, China, Australia and France, signed a document of a promise that is accessible and comprehensive to develop artificial intelligence, the United States chose – but the United Kingdom, which sparked eyebrows between the attendees and in the media.

“What we see here is this tension between, on the one hand, the desire to push the economy by creating artificial intelligence, and on the other hand, the need to organize it,” explained Teresa Skasa, a professor at the University of Ottawa who holds the head of Canada’s research in the Information and Politics Law.

Fansf bars against “excessive” regulations

She said that the United States, for example, is a home to major artificial intelligence companies “that wish to rule free to innovate, and since this innovation will put it at the forefront of the leadership of the economy. Any attempts to organize it will lead to their dumping.”

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom – which was witnessed by Skasa Economic shrinkage Since Britain has left the European Union – it has been trying to put itself as an alternative to the most conservative European Union approach to organizing artificial intelligence.

A spokesman for the UK Prime Minister, Kiir Starmer Country You will only invest in the initiatives that are in its “national interests”.

The American position on the artificial intelligence list was reached through the comments of the Vice President JD Vance, which occurred at the summit and criticized the conservative approach to the European Union, saying that the excessive organization will do so Kill the industry.

Then he seemed to warn countries against working with China, because doing this would make them vulnerable to spying, he said.

China has long been criticized for human rights practices, on the main document of the summit. This surprised some observers, and also called for the pledge to follow a sustainable and directed approach towards man to develop artificial intelligence.

European Commission President Ursula von der Layen prompted Fans’s description of its organizational environment, saying at the summit it hopes that Europe will be the commander of Amnesty International, but with its “distinctive approach” to reach there.

She and other European officials It was recently challenged Imagine that the difficult regulations of the European Union means that they are not open to innovation. On the contrary, she said at the Paris event.

“The artificial intelligence race has not yet ended. The truth is, we are only at first. The borders are constantly moving, and global leadership is still ready to seize it.”

Macron says that the European Union is behind the knees

Florian Martin Barretto, assistant professor at the University of Ottawa, said that France also took a different position on what the guests expect.

French President Emmanuel Macron, who participated in the presidency of the summit alongside Narindra Modi Indian, BullishLargely broken with the rest of the European Union messages. He suggested that the economic alliance may be very far from organizing technology, saying that its countries “Delay“

But most likely “the biggest surprise for many people” is that the last announcement signed at the Paris Summit-a non-binding pledge as a strong political boy, was lighter than expected, with few details about the organization, safety and misinformation.

Martin Barretto said that a similar summit was held in London last summer, focused on the potential existential risks of Amnesty International. He said that this seems less than the priority this time, which indicates a defeat on how countries deal with the organization.

He said: “It may be a great technique, but we have also seen in the past months that, depending on how it is developing it or who uses such a technology, it can be risky and has a real effect.” Use in overlap in global elections.

Other critics of the document contemplation The safety and integration language has been reduced in the final agreement of the resumption of the new American administration and its great technological allies. Some reports indicate that the United Kingdom He was following The United States was not signing – the United Kingdom denied this in a statement, Mysterious National security concerns.

The companies that frighten the countries that are organized

Some major technology companies have withdrawn from the regions that see it ExcessiveOlivier Blais, co -founder of MOOV AI, said.

This was the case in the European Union, which approved its organization of technology last year through the European Union’s European Union Law. The competition law was also approved called the Digital Markets Law, which was partial Why did not make features including Apple Intelligence? He said he was widely available in the area.

He added that this creates what is indicated in the industrial intelligence industry as a commercial barrier. “From the consumer’s point of view, it is bad because you cannot reach these tools,” he said.

But this lack of access can make people think more cash in technology: “Is it really responsible? Is it really safe to use these tools? It is a very legal question.” “Many people use these tools without asking themselves.”

The organizational environment is increasingly complicated

Skasa, a professor of Uottawa, said that the difference between the United States and the European Union in the organization of artificial intelligence puts Canada among its largest commercial partners, with many existential questions in the balance.

Canada currently does not have comprehensive legislation that regulates artificial intelligence; Federal government Proposal Such a law last year, but he died when Parliament was destroyed in January. Questions were about how to organize – if any – in the air since then.

Technology also becomes more complicated, as well as the organizational environment, as it added, with concerns about public security, poor information and climate impact.

“Some priorities may turn differently into different countries.”